One note: on my flight to Hawaii for the IETF, I tried running netperf-wrapper to see just how bloated the airplane system was (I presume it was GoGo, but don't know for sure: I was on United). On my second attempt to run the test, the on board system crashed entirely. I did not try again. - Jim On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:26 AM, wrote: > > GoGo does not need to run “Man in the Middle Attacks” on YouTube > > re: http://www.reed.com/blog-dpr/?p=174 > > I amplified via g+ and mentioned to slashdot. > ( > http://slashdot.org/submission/4107907/gogo-airline-network-blocks-youtube-when-they-could-just-fix-their-bufferbloat > ) I don't use reddit, but if someone here wants to hit this topic > there, perhaps it will help. > > I am very perturbed by the https interception stuff and agree that > they should fix their bufferbloat instead! So should amtrak and other > services trying to provide general useful email and web services when > they too have limited bandwidth... in an age where people want dancing > cat videos on the move and are completely ignorant of the hit on the > network that induces. > > I have quite a few benchmarks of Gogo in flight. They all suck. I > think the best deployable solution would require reworking their > satellite uplink management to be available bandwidth aware... > although I think they could get quite a lot of mileage out of merely > rate limiting and fq_codeling at the airplane itself. > > I note that we have not extensively tested fq_codel at the latencies > typically experienced here and probably should! > > I also tend to wish that streaming video had got it's own control port > rather than being layered over 80 and 443. > > lastly... I do appreciate very much your mention of me, but if you > could expand that bit to say any of the bufferbloat crew - all of us > seem to be looking for work, or distracted by other work. In my case I > am mostly now distracted by non-bufferbloat related, but paid work. > > The fact that I still have to rattle a tin cup to fix bufferbloat at > this point is quite bothersome. With such an epidemic of a problem I > really thought the world would have beat a path to our doors long, > long ago, and/or start leveraging the plethora of information and code > we have put online to go forth and deploy bufferbloat solutions, > especially in extreme cases like aircraft, access in the third world, > and in remote areas. Certainly the ubnt userbase jumped all over > fq_codel... > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > > > -- > Dave Täht > > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >