From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x236.google.com (mail-lf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B40A53B25D; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:33:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id y84so95630147lfc.0; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:33:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YT4RI+xE24pcmckFW7xSNKiftwEAAwInckD4dFw4ruM=; b=wfT7Y/j51eAAo6EGxrKBFI43zC45XcPohB1e3bgwe1B9fIYSK2BgYxMJe8MMhlZa9W dozRFVqCaVbRALJ8D/9xNqc30PTm/pgH3y66zBgPQ/1Vg/pxOmlHQMgXEhYGT5IWooIl FVL0FsWgM0/12i0WYbAkzOElYG8H9HbxlnfEibUVjBoy9EtMWUbk0wU3ITX6G73Em/KL UV87jy/GzHoa+XtruJXFGWMSUnZe+u66ApabOVG+5coj4junT6XVTsCXfG7E7pwTUrV8 9gEedSRF/vxkLyno156+Q1J1VjEdJxtUSJGw8+lNIuMsk91zp4SZioNElXqOgFfgIyGb YtSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YT4RI+xE24pcmckFW7xSNKiftwEAAwInckD4dFw4ruM=; b=N093drHPR4hfr/ZJg7qJnZhXy3RCJFp+xxoPGNy0OeXXm6Lrejy/zV23M/9hKTx/tm XLUvYzvF6evQIIQyDF06MnRPcGFREPikjwfOV4dC72Iy5caGkdN029+aYfKNh/BZZwkU Sm65Goivpw8B1Sh1vMAHRfGxvtFsPgpEPW0B74XIunHnY+N+F9APujR8GVzj3YcFMYyQ wI8YEM+zLoYc1KyHJkthTBk+VVpqPsk/mLqJTVF8/ztAUq1la1G3nJ5p00Yu3n+23jcP riXpCE+URfpExiM3xlKGQP4t+lYi07onb6q5SYG+4VeRLJ2zutwkhj6Yzmkd4ReBG5rW XW2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FU44e7ZeIKDpf36gmXNpRoFsnuR2ZS7kPUQW2WYVRPh1LLUAZD5MCZEG8re2zleYK5Tw0AwahiKAzAvnw== X-Received: by 10.25.218.75 with SMTP id r72mr6942470lfg.139.1461872029622; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:33:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.42 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:33:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87pot9jzuw.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> References: <1461849006.60252745@apps.rackspace.com> <87oa8tyhug.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <878tzx4zno.fsf@toke.dk> <4F01E09C-FE7E-4ADA-A142-656969C1A3CC@gmx.de> <87shy5k1hb.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <87pot9jzuw.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> From: Henning Rogge Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 21:33:19 +0200 Message-ID: To: Juliusz Chroboczek Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, "babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org" , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 May 2016 15:07:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Babel-users] [Make-wifi-fast] perverse powersave bug with sta/ap mode X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:33:50 -0000 On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> I must admit I have been thinking about switching off Duplicate >> Address Detection for mesh interfaces automatically... > > What problem are you trying to solve? Less useless overhead on slow-speed networks (think VHF/UHF radio). DAD works by pretending that the colliding address should be in communication range, which is not true for mesh networks. Henning