Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?

[Matt Mathis <mattmathis@google.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1627 bytes --]

Section 7.2 of
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-04 includes
a bufferbloat test.  It is however somewhat underspecified.

Thanks,
--MM--
The best way to predict the future is to create it.  - Alan Kay

Privacy matters!  We know from recent events that people are using our
services to speak in defiance of unjust governments.   We treat privacy and
security as matters of life and death, because for some users, they are.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:14 AM, MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN <
luca.muscariello@orange.com> wrote:

> FYI, we have this in France.
>
> http://www.arcep.fr/index.php?id=8571&tx_gsactualite_pi1[
> uid]=1701&tx_gsactualite_pi1[annee]=&tx_gsactualite_pi1[
> theme]=&tx_gsactualite_pi1[motscle]=&tx_gsactualite_pi1[backID]=26&cHash=
> f558832b5af1b8e505a77860f9d555f5&L=1
>
> ARCEP is the equivalent of FCC in France.
>
> User QoS is measured in the fixed access by third parties.
> The tests they run can be ameliorated  of course but the concept is right.
> The data is then published periodically.
>
> Luca
>
>
> On 03/20/2015 03:08 PM, David P. Reed wrote:
>
>> M-Lab is better by far. But control by Google automatically discredits
>> it's data. As well as the claims by operators that measurements by
>> independent parties violate their trade secrets. Winning that battle
>> requires a group that can measure while supporting a very expensive defense
>> against lawsuits by operators making such claim of trade secrecy.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2934 bytes --]