From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com (mail-ob0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B6E32012AD for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so21069015obq.16 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:35:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dYST6clyz6I9e30+kna99Y4kUhRDZu3Ca3Ks8QPSIhc=; b=slmMeOW2MRla0t20eRmsz35vzQ89NJf/a4SUSzrBbEhDGxUoRW1WbLPwn4ag8tR0nL dDTOJEFN6Ci/17psV6etEhNZHdyZHKKigAYlNPyRkffVMOcM297sRDYWEjk+G6bWSbk5 VtOXfwv9Fl01DJBft6nz5J1we4oa2IIOc3sVCdIEJUJrbt01P8Vd9fhivm/K5DsF97v+ TlJtSIYADiNGe1XoGAHj3dqV621gLiU3x7RY5hHL9o0PRCvb8F0rIMoTb9f5E5R3uqNB BZNDSBa6aTqusuRpNWiv0ENrI9N40esZto2mtZh38fu/rYUHEu864SOSiyNG5bo+GZWX cdeQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.17.99 with SMTP id n3mr13743552obd.8.1347935724481; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.24.42 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:35:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:35:23 -0400 Message-ID: From: Stephen Walker To: Dave Taht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:52:03 -0700 Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] next cerowrt release plan (of sorts) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 02:35:25 -0000 On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Maciej Soltysiak = wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >>> Other things in my backlog are two multicast responder-like daemons - >>> but can't remember their names mldna? >> It was minissdpd and miniupnpd, which are pre-requisites for allowing >> minidlna to work between multiple network segments like we have in >> cerowrt with 172.30.42.X/Y/Z... >> >> What needs to be done is: >> 1) add minissdpd and miniupnpd to the build >> 2) patch their default configs to cater for lan->se00 sw00 sw10 and wan-= >ge00 >> >> miniupnpd will also allow portforwarding negotiation for things like >> IM clients and, say, uTorrent. Also, it will score in netalyzr support >> for UPNP. >> >>> If you have trivial feature requests, please make 'em now! >>> If you have code you want to check in, please get them in by tuesday! >> See attached CRLF file. Since I had trouble and low patience for >> getting a normal cero build to even get a new package in, sorry for >> sending non-patch file with instructions. If it's unacceptable, please >> let me know, I'll try to juggle time to try again. >> >> p.s. have fun in Sugarland :-) > > I see that a minidlna package is in the main package feed for openwrt, > but it doesn't want to feeds install. The version you pointed me at in > the previous mail is someone's checkout of another feed. It would be > more fruitful to have this be working in openwrt first.... > > It could be that my feeds database is borked? > > same goes for sdpd. I'd kind of prefer the maintainer of the package > push it out into openwrt mainline, or make it available as an official > alternate feed I can pull a checkout from in cerowrt, rather than copy > directly into ceropackages. > > Does "trondah" have a public email addy? > > cc-ing our packager emeritus... Cshore would be the person to ask as he maintains miniupnpd and also owns https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/8988 for minissdpd. >> >> Regards, >> Maciej > > > > -- > Dave T=E4ht > http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-17 is out > with fq_codel!"