Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob McMahon <bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com>
To: chromatix99@gmail.com
Cc: dpreed@deepplum.com, bloat-announce@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	 Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Make-wifi-fast] closing up my make-wifi-fast lab
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:59:30 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHb6Lvp6BWg=6iCAogyQ6Adow7EsyLHLqwsCzX6X5dNq5yDNfA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A2F03A04-E45A-42CB-8DE1-365BE75BF732@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1958 bytes --]

ok thanks, that's helpful.  I guess I thought if astrophysicists can direct
image exoplanets
<https://www.space.com/30248-young-jupiter-smallest-directly-imaged-exoplanet.html>
a WiFi device should be able to detect superposition  - though, talk about
some giant hand waving! ;)

Bob

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:45 PM Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > On 27 Aug, 2018, at 10:11 pm, Bob McMahon <bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I guess my question is can a WiFi transmitting device rely on primarily
> energy detect and mostly ignore the EDCA probability game and rather search
> for (or predict) unused spectrum per a time interval such that its digital
> signal has enough power per its observed SNR?   Then detect "collisions"
> (or, "superposition cases" per the RX not having sufficient SINR) via
> inserting silent gaps in its TX used to sample ED, i.e. run energy detect
> throughout the entire transmission?  Or better, no silent gaps, rather
> detect if there is superimposed energy on it's own TX and predict a
> collision (i.e. RX probably couldn't decode its signal) occurred?  If
> doable, this seems simpler than having to realize centralized (or even
> distributed) media access algorithms a la, TDM, EDCA with ED, token buses,
> token rings, etc. and not require media access coordination by things like
> APs.
>
> The software might be simpler, but the hardware would need to be
> overspecified to the point of making it unreasonably expensive for consumer
> devices.
>
> Radio hardware generally has a significant TX/RX turnaround time, required
> for the RX deafening circuits to disengage.  Without those deafening
> circuits, the receivers would be damaged by the comparatively vast TX power
> in the antenna.
>
> So in practice, it's easier to measure SNR at the receiver, or indirectly
> by observing packet loss by dint of missing acknowledgements returned to
> the transmitter.
>
>  - Jonathan Morton
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2340 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-27 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-26 12:26 [Cerowrt-devel] " David P. Reed
2018-08-27  6:00 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Make-wifi-fast] " Bob McMahon
2018-08-27  6:26   ` Jonathan Morton
2018-08-27  7:06     ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27  7:52       ` Jonathan Morton
2018-08-27  8:34         ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27 19:11           ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27 19:45             ` Jonathan Morton
2018-08-27 19:59               ` Bob McMahon [this message]
     [not found]               ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1808271431590.2583@nftneq.ynat.uz>
2018-08-28  1:47                 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Bob McMahon
     [not found]                   ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1808271750490.2583@nftneq.ynat.uz>
2018-08-28  1:56                     ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-30 19:12               ` [Cerowrt-devel] " bkil
2018-08-30 19:17                 ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-30 20:36                   ` bkil
2018-09-03 19:30                     ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27  7:24     ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Luca Muscariello
2018-08-27  7:39       ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27  7:52         ` Luca Muscariello
2018-08-30 19:12 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " bkil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHb6Lvp6BWg=6iCAogyQ6Adow7EsyLHLqwsCzX6X5dNq5yDNfA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bloat-announce@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=dpreed@deepplum.com \
    --cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox