From: Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] that perpetual quest for funding
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:12:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHxHggf_2YFE-4=W-82243Vzd4uUJeF0LO4GEs_f2vRUEPaLdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7_mejNoM+Txux2vjUm-+qtdO7VaoJci1TGg4CMm6uqUg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2000 bytes --]
i wonder whether we could interest DHS S&T directorate in this - I will ask
Doug Maughan.
v
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I saw this go by today...
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-ybA8_Lt-gwc2RUWnN5eFFoekE/view
>
> also:
>
>
> http://venturebeat.com/2014/12/12/google-launches-the-open-web-of-things-inviting-research-proposals-to-advance-the-internet-of-things/
>
> I really hate that I do not qualify as an "academic"[1], nor do the
> other many open source developers advancing the state of the art - and
> probably would have trouble passing that particular bar... nor do I
> know what, specifically we do here that could apply to the parameters
> of this grant program...
>
> ... but doing another cerowrt version, make-wifi-fast, tinc-fq,
> fq_codel improvement, or any of the half dozen things like making
> dnssec, ipv6, or source specific routing more deployable...
>
> that we have done as outgrowths of the bufferbloat effort...
>
> on the same budget (nearly none) as we have survived on for the last 4
> years, is just *not in the cards*.
>
> At least not for me! It's been fun working with you all, and
> wonderfully productive... but I'd like to get off of top ramen.
>
> Are there things in the above, in the context of making home
> networking safer/smarter/faster/better, that could apply? Or any
> context, really? (benchmarking? simulation work)
>
> I did submit a proposal elsewhere for the "make fair queuing work well
> with vpns" idea that I proposed on this list earlier this month,
> rather than sit down and spend the time to actually do it...
>
> ... and I am looking over various other SBIR and NSF style grants.
>
> ... and trying to figure out what to do next year, that makes sense.
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> [1] I would really like to find a way to partner up formally with a uni or
> two.
>
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2852 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-15 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-15 18:31 Dave Taht
2014-12-15 20:12 ` Vint Cerf [this message]
2014-12-15 22:52 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHxHggf_2YFE-4=W-82243Vzd4uUJeF0LO4GEs_f2vRUEPaLdg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=vint@google.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox