From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (mail-oa0-f51.google.com [209.85.219.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11DD721F1D4 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:32:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id n12so1164507oag.24 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:32:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iPqEnUZHqdZP1O7N/8zJU//nk2un827LrssdFwoMZe4=; b=a8w8AJDBobvmeQ3UKmNrP8QO4RpCsVBVNKqPJuDgSc6Q0FMGTH3YfI5Crz9ObmmtZ3 h6XEZCO2T0p1V8VGES681lApfOSyYIFJ0YZ5QSzjtIWutkNBp5Pk8E6HkZ5rtO+4wJ8C fnqG37jQubCW0moLYRIuEg0hTdLJ33Vo1o/Caq9BI2eVQppijS6AnKAo4x9e8EtzaqSn kYlgQrpI5ctFOsSfy/HfxiWF8zymPioIro6F19oegmC5DxfaA+0QxgRpKZEmhRXFuzAT iSXbyMDG2ZSRC1HYtfWj9Rjrw7d0vd/3p5o8eh1Sdkq1zzdOXhAFdVxOpuJqPMD5RKRe h2mQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.19.231 with SMTP id i7mr331454oee.34.1358328724828; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:32:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.94.239 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:32:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:32:04 -0800 Message-ID: From: Justin Madru To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c60a21b09304d3648d52 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 03:40:41 -0800 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] DLNA with wired and wireless devices X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:32:06 -0000 --e89a8ff1c60a21b09304d3648d52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I have a wired DLNA server (minidlna) on the wired network, but require wireless devices to have access to it. It seems that with the default setup (the split of the wired and wireless into separate networks), devices on the wireless network are not able to discover the DLNA server. Is there a way to work around this? Or is the only solution to restore the traditional 192.168.x.x single network setup? -- Justin --e89a8ff1c60a21b09304d3648d52 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I have a wired DLNA server (min= idlna) on the wired network, but require wireless devices to have access to= it. It seems that with the default setup (the split of the wired and wirel= ess into separate networks), devices on the wireless network are not able t= o discover the DLNA server.

Is there a way to work around this? Or is the only solution = to restore the traditional 192.168.x.x single network setup?
=
-- Justin
--e89a8ff1c60a21b09304d3648d52--