From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-x22d.google.com (mail-vc0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CCB521F36D; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:18:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hy4so2779109vcb.4; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:18:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Fu1yUMLiLQGg5UOs66vgGKPuUFRmXNbz0gkUa+Omf4s=; b=evXFUq7o06q9fy1z9km8LeVYTiGOrgQM1rkBqryEOEztHQM8fBgrlnsBcT2CzZ2DqH Q5ARb24CJAA97fsWvkmLTpmz+jKqlGzEh5uomrG+nnG5Zh1amiiy41CxxBC/90lYSCZP cx9JjlT9S8qlcUpa4MrYmd88ErhFXhZRjS7KOfpppQxBbG77dYq1GucfaOXlfljcsCHF Kg5Jwzuh4FXApxI7uJlWZrFmi99FUQvLBT2V9uiEeBi4G7Sq1YBDsUVdskNlwFu6xCvs HpCVLNQYbm/9lnmgMf4F8wtINpf6+a6npj7VWi+5vt5EBDqxD3E4rcYqS3rLJa9FCsFa OlXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.180.98 with SMTP id dn2mr6341721vdc.96.1424909912454; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:18:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.24.79 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:18:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.24.79 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:18:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54EE6222.5030408@candelatech.com> References: <54EE6222.5030408@candelatech.com> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 02:18:32 +0200 Message-ID: From: Jonathan Morton To: Isaac Konikoff Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51a821a2b3d61050ff2b1ac Cc: cerowrt-devel , bloat Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Two d-link products tested for bloat... X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:19:02 -0000 --bcaec51a821a2b3d61050ff2b1ac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Here's a comparison plot of box totals: http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/rtt_fair4be-comparison-box-plot.png That's a real mess. All of them utterly fail to get download bandwidth anywhere near the upload (am I right in assuming it should ideally be about equal?), and the only ones with even halfway acceptable latency are the ones with least throughput in either direction. - Jonathan Morton --bcaec51a821a2b3d61050ff2b1ac Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Here's a comparison plot of box totals:
http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/rtt_fair4be-comparison-box-p= lot.png

That's a real mess. All of them utterly fail to get down= load bandwidth anywhere near the upload (am I right in assuming it should i= deally be about equal?), and the only ones with even halfway acceptable lat= ency are the ones with least throughput in either direction.

- Jonathan Morton

--bcaec51a821a2b3d61050ff2b1ac--