From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net,
"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Cake] documentation review request and out of tree cake builds for openwrt/etc.
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 17:38:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE0scZvJqqoRSQ+LF3BZqVk+EZX4xz3-ZVrA_U2-yd4Qjw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4ax3c+Ak7Rn4zvzZPFJWu6V5HL3q8Nx2vUvfBvXOM4Pg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 679 bytes --]
It took me a while to get around to thinking about this, partly because my
phone inexplicably refuses to believe snapon exists.
I have two possible explanations for these results. Maybe both apply to
some extent.
Dropping packets rather than marking them results in an increase in ack
density in the reverse direction, because delayed acks get temporarily
disabled. The strength of this effect depends on the BDP and the depth of
delayed acks.
Increasing the number of simultaneous flows might increase the CPU load of
connection tracking for NAT. Are you shaping and doing NAT on the same box?
I think this might be the basic reason for increased latency.
- Jonathan Morton
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 766 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 18:04 [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2015-04-28 20:52 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Cake] " Jonathan Morton
2015-04-30 0:10 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 14:38 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2015-04-30 15:17 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-01 9:50 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-05-01 11:06 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-04-30 14:52 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJq5cE0scZvJqqoRSQ+LF3BZqVk+EZX4xz3-ZVrA_U2-yd4Qjw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox