From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] archer c7 v2, policing, hostapd, test openwrt build
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:13:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE2fcd30NB+D9ecT4CVHoMp5xBEV_=qXKnm4KoJt+J1N0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E254B728-F641-494C-BD18-FAA33A9D0880@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 619 bytes --]
What I'm seeing on your first tests is that double egress gives you
slightly more download at the expense of slightly less upload throughout.
The aggregate is higher.
Your second set of tests tells me almost nothing, because it exercises the
upload more and the download less. Hence why I'm asking for effectively the
opposite test. The aggregate is still significantly higher with double
egress, though.
The ping numbers also tell me that there's no significant latency penalty
either way. Even when CPU saturated, it's still effectively controlling the
latency better than leaving the pipe open.
- Jonathan Morton
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 711 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-24 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 0:24 Dave Taht
2015-03-23 0:31 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 1:10 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 1:18 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 1:34 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 1:45 ` David Lang
2015-03-23 2:00 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 2:10 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 2:15 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 2:18 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 6:09 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-23 13:43 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 16:09 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 0:00 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 0:05 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-24 0:07 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 3:16 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-24 7:47 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-24 8:13 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2015-03-24 8:46 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 1:14 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 6:17 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-29 11:16 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 12:48 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-29 14:16 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-29 15:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-23 17:08 ` David Lang
2015-03-23 16:17 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-23 16:27 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-23 17:07 ` David Lang
2015-03-23 18:16 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJq5cE2fcd30NB+D9ecT4CVHoMp5xBEV_=qXKnm4KoJt+J1N0w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox