From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from alum-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu (alum-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu [18.7.68.18]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7762021F2A4 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:41:19 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074412-f79a76d000007c8b-bc-5588c74f521d Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (OUTGOING-ALUM.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.33]) by alum-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id CB.B5.31883.F47C8855; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:41:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (mail-ig0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jjreisert@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id t5N2fIES003446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:41:19 -0400 Received: by igblr2 with SMTP id lr2so44637021igb.0 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:41:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.40.130 with SMTP id tq2mr29628883icb.46.1435027278320; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.87.200 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:41:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <26463A88-821B-44B7-A728-64BCB0B7C7BB@gmx.de> <55847E32.9000405@gmail.com> <5584823E.4040207@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:41:18 -0600 Message-ID: From: Jim Reisert AD1C To: Dave Taht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprGKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixO6iqOt/vCPU4MQ5cYu+rztZHBg9tl88 wxTAGMVtk5RYUhacmZ6nb5fAnbHg0Aq2gimsFU+vfmBtYJzJ0sXIySEhYCIxf+NdNghbTOLC vfVANheHkMBlRokDZ0+wQzhfmCRuvZvGAuH0MkpM3niMCaSFV0BQ4uTMJ0AJDqD2Yom/LUog YSEBL4nLF26xg9icAoEStycsg+pdyCJxfe05sNUsAqoSGzc8ZYeYEyDR/6YJ7AxhgSyJDx3n wOJsAvoSW/dfANslIqAsMeX+CbA4s4C5xOL9R5lA9jILqEusnyc0gVFwFpKLZiFkFjAyrWKU S8wpzdXNTczMKU5N1i1OTszLSy3SNdPLzSzRS00p3cQICUuhHYzrT8odYhTgYFTi4b04pyNU iDWxrLgy9xCjJAeTkijv181AIb6k/JTKjMTijPii0pzU4kOMEhzMSiK8U0HKeVMSK6tSi/Jh UtIcLErivD8Xq/sJCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZGU4OJQkeCWOATUKFqWmp1akZeaUIKSZODhBhnNJ iRSn5qWkFiWWlmTEgyI1vhgYqyApHqC9RSDtvMUFiblAUYjWU4yWHFt+X1vLxLHgx20guW3q vbVMQix5+XmpUuK80SANAiANGaV5cOtgyekVozjQ98K8JiBVPMDEBjf1FdBCJqCFX3LbQBaW JCKkpBoYteK/VvwSqe0Pf/G/N/Tl+doDgVctNym/qX7Sb1q33dbhh1D7vvnZV2Zc0Dzj+uJE ZZxfyyq53HzZ+c97HEy8neQcmXmktlz8b7O+cJ787VMvuBtrzfx/C7Cdr9q+7aFNvIryGeNF 7x95s16qvb9gy32Fs09DE98aFadrKEQe2Kh5QmBdvNJWJZbijERDLeai4kQAXbXtnCkDAAA= Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 02:41:48 -0000 On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > Fresh bits! Get your fresh bits here! (totally untested) > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/lupin/ar71xx/ I installed the factory image on a WNDR3800 and all came up as it should. WINS networking is working, both Dish Network and Sony blu-ray players have wireless Internet access. Are the "out-of-the-box" settings for SQM acceptable for Comcast (60 Mbs down/6 Mbs up)? Should I check the "Enable" box on the SQM "Basic Settings" tab? Should I change any settings on the "Queue Discipline" tab? Thanks - Jim -- Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us