From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from alum-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (alum-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu [18.7.68.20]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE6F21F2B2 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:35:33 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074414-f794f6d000007852-cb-55896eb56854 Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (OUTGOING-ALUM.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.33]) by alum-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 86.D6.30802.5BE69855; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:35:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com (mail-ie0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jjreisert@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id t5NEZWPc001209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:35:33 -0400 Received: by ieqy10 with SMTP id y10so12986879ieq.0 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:35:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.50.98 with SMTP id b2mr2554576igo.42.1435070132531; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.87.200 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:35:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0129B5FB-9D1B-45FF-84CA-492A6A0B638B@gmx.de> References: <26463A88-821B-44B7-A728-64BCB0B7C7BB@gmx.de> <55847E32.9000405@gmail.com> <5584823E.4040207@gmail.com> <0129B5FB-9D1B-45FF-84CA-492A6A0B638B@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:35:32 -0600 Message-ID: From: Jim Reisert AD1C To: Sebastian Moeller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprGKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixO6iqLs1rzPUYNN9QYu+rztZHBg9tl88 wxTAGMVtk5RYUhacmZ6nb5fAnXH91xeWgnvMFee+NDE1MHYwdzFyckgImEhM3dvDDmGLSVy4 t56ti5GLQ0jgMqPExZurGCGcL0wSvYtPskM4vYwSzRseMIK08AoISpyc+YQFor1AYvfeSWBx IQEviflTjwCN4uDgFLCS+HjZH6J3BqvEjyk7WEFqWARUJRa8fMoCMSdA4u6zDjYQW1ggS+JD xzmwk9gE9CW27r/ABDJHREBdYlmzPMgcZoGFjBKbl7WAzWcGiq+fJzSBUXAWkotmIWQWMDKt YpRLzCnN1c1NzMwpTk3WLU5OzMtLLdK10MvNLNFLTSndxAgJS5EdjEdOyh1iFOBgVOLhPTG1 I1SINbGsuDL3EKMkB5OSKO93985QIb6k/JTKjMTijPii0pzU4kOMEhzMSiK8FqlAOd6UxMqq 1KJ8mJQ0B4uSOO+3xep+QgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkZDg4lCd4PuUCNgkWp6akVaZk5JQhpJg5O kOFcUiLFqXkpqUWJpSUZ8aBIjS8GxipIigdobzJIO29xQWIuUBSi9RSjJceW39fWMnEs+HEb SG6bem8tkxBLXn5eqpQ4bx9IgwBIQ0ZpHtw6WHJ6xSgO9L0wryVIFQ8wscFNfQW0kAlo4Zfc NpCFJYkIKakGRm3tyiX1TNVGcd/zXQq/SD7+s/tBtJiyoAP/rew6z/LDUz9IuAbn+Z2rsm2s blx468npBAdd8e6NNzYoHmr4efbQzSIGmYmF+gffuq57pvmV5fXr2mfpjOsr7Xk/TuhZwLQq ++eGcOuvp7/c+Fx8ZXGG1D6T/Vp77PlVH8x2078sHZ2u6fezWomlOCPRUIu5qDgRAKI7We0p AwAA Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:36:02 -0000 On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Most likely not. Check http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/sqm. > Rich published a great set of instructions for setting up sqm-scripts under OpenWRT proper. Thanks, Sebastian. I did as you suggested. It was eye-opening looking at the results from http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest both before and after enabling SQM. Wow! - Jim -- Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us