From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from alum-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (alum-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu [18.7.68.19]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C416C21F95B for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:48:13 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074413-f79bd6d000007ac2-44-559c734c5c89 Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (OUTGOING-ALUM.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.33]) by alum-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 71.2B.31426.C437C955; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 20:48:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jjreisert@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id t680mBba009294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 20:48:12 -0400 Received: by igcqs7 with SMTP id qs7so45300936igc.0 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 17:48:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.136.89 with SMTP id k86mr11906802iod.53.1436316491804; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 17:48:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.87.200 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:48:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <559B2513.3020909@isi.edu> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 18:48:11 -0600 Message-ID: From: Jim Reisert AD1C To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpileLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYndR1PUpnhNqsPSyukXf150sDowe2y+e YQpgjOK2SUosKQvOTM/Tt0vgzjh0aBpzwTuOiu+Pe1kbGLvYuxg5OCQETCQuzvLsYuQEMsUk Ltxbz9bFyMUhJHCZUWJVw3Io5zOTRNfxhSwQTi+jxJwNc1hAWngFBCVOznzCAtFeIjF72Qtm kKlCAp4SjR0JIGFOAVuJhiM9zCC2kECkRPO7zWDlLAIqErPerWSEGBMgceXGcyYQW1ggTqJt 4Ww2EJtNQF9i6/4LYHERAX+J8/evsoCMZxZQl1g/T2gCo8AsJEfMQsgsYGRaxSiXmFOaq5ub mJlTnJqsW5ycmJeXWqRrrpebWaKXmlK6iRESesI7GHedlDvEKMDBqMTD+yFyTqgQa2JZcWXu IUZJDiYlUV6vZKAQX1J+SmVGYnFGfFFpTmrxIUYJDmYlEd4Ed6Acb0piZVVqUT5MSpqDRUmc V22Jup+QQHpiSWp2ampBahFMVoaDQ0mCd2ohUKNgUWp6akVaZk4JQpqJgxNkOJeUSHFqXkpq UWJpSUY8KBrji4HxCJLiAdqbXgSyt7ggMRcoCtF6itGYY8vva2uZOLZNvbeWSYglLz8vVUqc 9zvIJgGQ0ozSPLhFsKTzilEc6G9h3nUgVTzAhAU37xXQKiagVct1Z4GsKklESEk1MC5QnP6e MzUu8Nqy+wVrao0fp7gsccxOZQwxD1WsslXIZS//Injpys7cKy2+6xlqvxporas/MFGSjX/u 6h7e6h+1Mwpv9NsGp9z7KpCaznN2648D/M7LV6wukF5vuHq1yfPd3vOuO8/3erCuYOkC+Zv7 WxfpPdpv+F7B89KZkxv/3FzyIvzUS0slluKMREMt5qLiRACdb1nsFQMAAA== Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] failing to find the "declared victory" in a current wifi router X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:48:42 -0000 On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Brown wrote: > The WNDR3800 remains our gold standard for CeroWrt builds. It'll do SQM up to ~30 mbps, then the CPU runs out of gas. Could someone on this list please quantify what "the CPU runs out of gas" means? Is this when steaming full-bandwidth? What happens when this threshold is reached? I'm concerned because my Comcast service runs at 60 Mbps (nominal), and we have been having some intermittent glitches with Netflix. I'm running the last CeroWrt release that Dave Taht published, with default SQM profile enabled. In the interest of family harmony, I've never sat in front of the TV while watching the real-time status on the router, to see if it's even getting close to or going over 30 Mbps. There's usually little else happening on the LAN while Netflix is on. If I am saturating the router (SQM), I'd like to find a better HW solution. However, it seems like getting CeroWRT going on the various Linksys AC1200/1900 models is not as straightforward as on the WNDR3800. - Jim -- Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us