From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5082821F0B6 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:36:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iabz25 with SMTP id z25so6653502iab.16 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:36:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jg+M2ZfETOTXFDxUdnZzMnpSFKepvkLVvt7x+bG84iY=; b=C+9zEhGxnJZsAhs3pqbDO5N6pdO7qwIHFxlpdb9GkBJXX274yNs+f6ekXC6baBV8ff XTW75W2Wel9ltVQFmAEVadB7uzETNiP0JEw9wCOerPgtdXr0KvPwGCgdxAv5sGjImr7t 15rD64rYALBgmVdBd80aMvI4livDg8vMhBZYGqalk7r6ANE+dNoiUF+ImSKIdikcpdu0 OWjWLNymdz/FX5Xs1ZuOxt+cGh0ubvbCZmUbethxq8pva2086GTpaK2w9vH7UjYKfA29 GIyQrDxRB6/VaHjTpwYrWoDmQ2iBqxwBLQ1aO7vGUV4MrY31HlkKOccISOJVXlbdmz2Z 9jeQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.217.137 with SMTP id oy9mr9084574igc.56.1347028587688; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.72.135 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:36:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:36:27 -0400 Message-ID: From: Outback Dingo To: Andy S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Ubnt builds X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:36:29 -0000 On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Andy S wrote: > > On 6 September 2012 17:20, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> The ubnt builds are a bit out of date (part of my test deployment of >> fq_codel at a campground here - the yurtlab! >> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/lupin/yurtlab.jpg which is >> blessedly free >> of competing wifi signals) >> >> They are also a little specialized. Among other things, they have my >> ssh public key in them, >> and are keyed to local dns, they rely on the babel protocol to route >> and mesh together, although they do come up presently on a fixed ip >> address that needs to be changed, instead of relying on AHCP for their >> IPs and dns. >> >> All of quagga (including OSPF) IS built, it's just that babel is the >> default. >> >> In working with this build and test deployment I exposed some problems >> with memory usage in codel and the ath9k driver. Quagga will get >> OOM-killed under heavy loads, such as RTP and UDP flooding across >> multiple diffserv values, on the 2HP boxes in AP mode. The p2p >> backbone (nanostation M5s) has never crashed on me. >> >> This points long term towards developing a "mfq_codel", which would >> have one qdisc and *one* set of buffers that controls all four >> hardware queues. However, try as I might, I haven't wrapped my head >> around how to merge the code for sch_mq and sch_fq_codel, in a way >> that would work. (?) >> >> Aside from that it's working rather well, and the hacks I have in >> place now to reduce skb size seem to help a lot. >> >> Now that the memory problems are mostly beaten I will be doing a >> respin and re-deployment towards the end of the month. If I can build >> something a little more generic and easy to deploy on ubnt for others, >> I will do so, getting to where all this code runs well in 32MB is >> rather important to me. >> >> Let me know. >> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Andy S wrote= : >> > I see that there are UBNT builds available for specific deployment >> > scenarios; we use Ubiquiti Bullet M5's on some parts of our (city-wide= ) >> > 5.8Ghz wireless network, but they don't support OSPF, so if any of the >> > builds of Cerowrt support Bullet M5 and OSPF (I see the Quagga-ospf >> > modules >> > available in the main devel builds) - we would be interested to >> > hear/test! >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > A >> > -- >> > http://www.bristolwireless.net/ | 0117 325 0067 | >> > sip:info@bristolwireless.net >> > Bristol Wireless >> > Windmill Hill City Farm >> > Philip Street >> > Bedminster >> > Bristol BS3 4EA >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave T=E4ht >> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-17 is out >> with fq_codel!" > > > Sounds great, still none the wiser as to whether your builds will work on > the Bullet or not, as the Bullet and NanoStation run different software b= y > default. > > Most of what you guys do is waaay over my head, but I'm keen to try stuff > out, although this may necessitate a sacrificial Bullet! Once a UBNT devices image is built itll run for the most part, guess i could spend some time today pitching in and see if one can be created though size might become an issue. Ill run a build and see what happens, Ive got some Picos here i can flash > > Keep us posted! > > A > > > -- > http://www.bristolwireless.net/ | 0117 325 0067 | > sip:info@bristolwireless.net > Bristol Wireless > Windmill Hill City Farm > Philip Street > Bedminster > Bristol BS3 4EA > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >