Re: [Cerowrt-devel] edgerouter LTE beta w/fq_codel upcoming

[Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1590 bytes --]

You obviously mean edgerouter LITE right? there is no LTE wireless
edgerouter, though that would be nice as a backup/failover


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> As I pointed out here,  there is more work to be done  on that  front
>
>
> http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/S-FQ-CoDel-Support-Possible/m-p/799394#M28651
>
> Mostly  my hope  is to get a SQM-like shaper/aqm/scheduler rewritten
> in  the vyatta command  language that works at  rates  up  to 200Mbit.
>
> All the published examples  have problems:
>
> http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bufferbloat  for  example,  uses SFQ
> and a very small queue length that is probably ineffective.
>
> There  have been various other  examples forwarded to  me that all
> need  some love,
> including  one  very elaborate one that uses ifb semi-correctly, and
> then goes nutso  with
> ack prioritization.  (can't find any of these now)
>
> ...
>
> And  it did look that adding BQL support was easily possible for  the
> underlying driver,  but I didn't  sink  any time  into  that  - the
> key "driver" (it's really an  interface   to a binary blob) is  in:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/octeon
>
> and  it's  unclear  how much buffering is built into  the blob.
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> NSFW:
> https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2522 bytes --]