From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yb1-xb36.google.com (mail-yb1-xb36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD2C3CB35 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 01:11:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb36.google.com with SMTP id u88-v6so1714632ybi.0 for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:11:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aenertia.net; s=dkimaenertianet; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1kih+MpIip6fE0cfpk9Zh5WFPBftB96HFjcLtqn/Ae0=; b=FcVA4UoKDcQpvBm9+YrH31LvhQVlIzmY+DKS3ybybhBF7ZjB43O7TRJmsU3d6PZWtD HdtnnzVCg97WPh3SdQpExdlFWYN1au68ZbzBqd4/EsGvyLjHSFbVpSged9FrpsNNZsWa uS8KzqL2nG1DsDv0yC6v1xRIfmdBwZGQgqo3E= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1kih+MpIip6fE0cfpk9Zh5WFPBftB96HFjcLtqn/Ae0=; b=FPV2yjnyAKGInyax//HnUmJHPmmATwMQoYR5nVOpnDpZjZTT+K5UojlsxWGfCD4zSK 3c0AsK+Q3uX5VCqNZcUq28ZE4IDvTGKb3oMQCOYpEwPzKuF/8A10zuY1DMIULURA4q6/ r3YkGuxZkKeWMdaXg+N/g8OtVStH3wmzr1u2NgtkDLblCNS2BsdE1WoDjLUGIquw5M4S 9DC7khefvtWplT0V2do/aWS7WtXzccJ8YWLf4JKDG55tDACXmFq/mSX0SZYo1SCGB9Sn Ed2ljccj2t7WHkVI1T5ceiI89ZtXwckc/j+EJEUOmOaHqvKdRq4CBNt0lTSGiWeyCmN6 fklA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohRulmyX7P6B0SCzb0K8P16tbkGMCq8X80FxxQJcDT5ctKwqVvc ae3O+UuEScS24oINeJdjw9Y1IMHPrtr44Ot1ZZpWag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV605lEGRqsPh8PaEsABXgKt4qan6BPTT7iV8p1siKocYFkmRALxAItaG+veGSQ3xjEHjGztr2dxhLfR8hqpOVYM= X-Received: by 2002:a25:2e43:: with SMTP id b3-v6mr17400840ybn.268.1539148288919; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:11:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <105682.1539122782@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <3D59500D-9AC4-40EE-8F1E-ABB5116CCD78@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Joel_Wir=C4=81mu_Pauling?= Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 18:11:15 +1300 Message-ID: To: moeller0@gmx.de Cc: Jonathan Morton , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] wifi trick with comcast X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 05:11:29 -0000 Must have some seriously terrible speeds on the main connection to make this worth while; i.e sub 100mbit. The hassles with port forwarding/per connection tracking and having to then optimise latency sensitive traffic using rules to prefer wired vs wifi uplink etc really make this pretty niche use-case. The only valid reason for this would be to have a backup path; but then again it's using the same providers network so it's not a different AS anyway. If you are using Multi-wan for additional speed ; then you should probably think about getting a new provider/plan.