From: "Joel Wirāmu Pauling" <joel@aenertia.net>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] LCA 2018 talk available
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:45:57 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKiAkGQbOCozMnh6H9QGxDSTSqRwD9NFp_N4B5Tv3cEA39=BuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKiAkGSrc1AAp=eUOu5=6h93nOY_e-zLDvr7xsnj33O8rAAWaw@mail.gmail.com>
it's late /throughput/latency/%s
On 15 February 2018 at 00:45, Joel Wirāmu Pauling <joel@aenertia.net> wrote:
> Aquantia 10GBase-T TB3 self powered, adapters are now available. They
> support 803.11bz.
>
> Again it's not the speed, it's the throughput. TB3 delivers near to
> what my local x86 can do in terms of throughput. Also network should
> never be slower than disc. Since NVME has been around this is
> no-longer true. It's an unnatural order of things.
>
> Interestingly the NVME stuff came about by a competing teams during
> the same time as Lightpeak. They share many underlying philosophies.
>
> --
>
> Cabling is the issue in my mind right now. Every laptop with tb3 ports
> has 10G+ capability, if passive optical long run was cheap and easily
> available for tb3 then half the problem would already be solved.
>
> Maybe 10G over cat6a will be ok as the evolution. But you have to go
> to cat8 to get anything beyond 10G... so the cabling situation and
> incentive to upgrade to future-proof isn't there.
>
> On 15 February 2018 at 00:33, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
>>
>>> Kia Ora (Hi in Māori).
>>>
>>> Today I delivered my talk on 10Gbit(+) in the home at Linuxconf
>>> Australasia. Some specific shout outs to those on the list who helped form
>>> some of the content and especially for the continued efforts with FLENT
>>> which I have been making extensive use of both professionally and
>>> privately.
>>>
>>> Hopefully this is of some interest and use to people on the list.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/aenertia/lca2018-talk/tree/talk
>>
>>
>> Great presentation, thanks.
>>
>> Some feedback. I have been told MOCA is widely used in USA, and this is
>> in-house coax cabling used for providing IP based services in multiple
>> rooms.
>>
>> http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-set-up-a-coax-MoCA-network/
>>
>> Now, this doesn't have much to do with your 10GE talk as it's not going to
>> be that fast, but anyway. So back to > 1GE speeds.
>>
>> It seems to me that 1GE is good enough for a lot of user needs. It's over
>> 100 megabyte/s, most HDDs won't even transfer faster than this. Most devices
>> do not have anything faster than 1GE, so it's a chicken and egg problem. I
>> have a 100EUR fanless managable 24 port switch with 4 SFP ports. I imagine
>> anything faster than this would require fans and would bring up the cost a
>> lot.
>>
>> It would be ideal to have a 24 port 1GE + 4 (or 8) ports of 1/2.5/5/10GE for
>> incremental migration, but I have 0 things in my home that speaks anything
>> faster than 1GBASE-T (with RJ45 connector). I do have SFP+ based NIC cards
>> and DAC cables, but I don't even use them (apart from occasional testing).
>>
>> The upgrade was from 100BASE-T to 1GBASE-T was fairly cheap and addressed a
>> wide need, since 10-11 megabyte/s was slower than most HDDs even 15-20 years
>> ago. Today, 100-110megabyte/s at 1GBASE-T speeds is actually still quite
>> decent, and most people don't have huge amounts of data to move around. So
>> for most people, anything faster than 1GBASE-T doesn't address a problem
>> they actually have. Yes, for people handling 4k footage and doing video
>> editing etc, they need faster. But most people don't. For them a 8-24 port
>> 1GBASE-T switch is fine, and provides a networking solution that is not
>> bottlenecking them in any significant fashion.
>>
>> 2.5G and 5G would be a good compromise, but it seems to be stuck in
>> chicken/egg problem space. Most people actually don't even wire their
>> computers today, it's all wifi, and even if they do wire them, the only NIC
>> available is 1GBASE-T based.
>>
>> The iMac Pro is the first prosumer device I have seen that actually supports
>> faster networking. If Apple or someone else actually released a thunderbolt
>> based NIC that was decently sized/priced that did support 2.5G or 5GBASE-T,
>> then this chicken/egg problem could perhaps be solved. Most people don't
>> feel the need to connect these kinds of things to their laptop:
>>
>> https://www.startech.com/uk/Networking-IO/Adapter-Cards/thunderbolt-3-10-gbe-nic-chassis~BNDTB310GNDP
>> https://www.akitio.com/adapters/thunder2-10g-network-adapter
>> https://www.promise.com/Products/SANLink/SANLink2/10G-BaseT
>>
>> http://www.tehutinetworks.net/?t=LV&L1=3&L2=0&L3=0&L7=157 is interesting, as
>> this is not huge. It also does 2.5G and 5G.
>>
>> https://www.anandtech.com/show/12422/akitios-thunder3-10g-adapter-now-available
>>
>> 300USD is still a significant chunk of money compared to the 29USD 1GBASE-T
>> thunderbolt2 adapter that Apple sells.
>>
>> But still, with these kinds of products, there might be hope!
>>
>> --
>> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-14 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAKiAkGRDb_fgyBLtR=HzYKXFJAJ_A2jp2u4-HOLE4iN3NG5MoQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAKiAkGS4O7oyskY_ft6NOpUob1ytZDewZt5Bv7W_XL2=SyEEQQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAKiAkGTGfrW92E8-ZC1+ZaCxuzYFhkiy=jpmcuCUx15k7DExZg@mail.gmail.com>
2018-01-25 3:30 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-02-14 11:33 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2018-02-14 11:45 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-02-14 11:45 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling [this message]
2018-02-14 13:21 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2018-02-14 22:13 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-02-15 9:59 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKiAkGQbOCozMnh6H9QGxDSTSqRwD9NFp_N4B5Tv3cEA39=BuQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=joel@aenertia.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox