Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joel Wirāmu Pauling" <joel@aenertia.net>
To: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@deepplum.com>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
	 cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 10gige and 2.5gige
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:31:57 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKiAkGRDwkH0yW0buxdUGyktE9XCT9RjospS=mbs_TfXWKh5Sg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1639678615.275317887@apps.rackspace.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3221 bytes --]

Heat issues you mention with UTP are gone; with the 803.bz stuff (i.e
Base-N).

It was mostly due to the 10G-Base-T spec being old and out of line with the
SFP+ spec ; which led to higher power consumption than SFP+ cages were
rated to draw and aforementioned heat problems; this is not a problem with
newer kit.
It went away with the move to smaller silicon processes and now UTP based
10G in the home devices are more common and don't suffer from the fragility
issues of the earlier copper based 10G spec. The AQC chipsets were the
first to introduce it but most other vendors have finally picked it up
after 5 years or feet dragging.



On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:16 AM David P. Reed <dpreed@deepplum.com> wrote:

> Yes, it's very cheap and getting cheaper.
>
>
>
> Since its price fell to the point I thought was cheap, my home has a 10
> GigE fiber backbone, 2 switches in my main centers of computers, lots of 10
> GigE NICs in servers, and even dual 10 GigE adapters in a Thunderbolt 3
> external adapter for my primary desktop, which is a Skull Canyon NUC.
>
>
>
> I strongly recommend people use fiber and sfp+ DAC cabling because twisted
> pair, while cheaper, actually is problematic at speeds above 1 Gig - mostly
> due to power and heat.
>
>
>
> BTW, it's worth pointing out that USB 3.1 can handle 10 Gb/sec, too, and
> USB-C connectors and cables can carry Thunderbolt at higher rates.  Those
> adapters are REALLY CHEAP. There's nothing inherently different about the
> electronics, if anything, USB 3.1 is more complicate logic than the
> ethernet MAC.
>
>
>
> So the reason 10 GigE is still far more expensive than USB 3.1 is mainly
> market volume - if 10 GigE were a consumer product, not a datacenter
> product, you'd think it would already be as cheap as USB 3.1 in computers
> and switches.
>
>
>
> Since DOCSIS can support up to 5 Gb/s, I think, when will Internet Access
> Providers start offering "Cable Modems" that support customers who want
> more than "a full Gig"? Given all the current DOCSIS 3 CMTS's etc. out
> there, it's just a configuration change.
>
>
>
> So when will consumer "routers" support 5 Gig, 10 Gig?
>
>
>
> On Thursday, December 16, 2021 11:20am, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> said:
>
> > has really got cheap.
> >
> > https://www.tomshardware.com/news/innodisk-m2-2280-10gbe-adapter
> >
> > On the other hand users are reporting issues with actually using
> > 2.5ghz cable with this router in particular, halving the achieved rate
> > by negotiating 2.5gbit vs negotiating 1gbit.
> >
> > https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=179145#p897836
> >
> >
> > --
> > I tried to build a better future, a few times:
> > https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
> >
> > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5916 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-16 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-16 16:20 Dave Taht
2021-12-16 18:16 ` David P. Reed
2021-12-16 19:31   ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling [this message]
2021-12-16 21:29     ` David P. Reed
2021-12-16 21:43       ` David Lang
2021-12-16 21:57         ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2021-12-17  8:18           ` Sebastian Moeller
2021-12-17  8:36             ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2021-12-17  8:39               ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2021-12-17  9:26                 ` Sebastian Moeller
2021-12-17 11:33                   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-12-17  8:57               ` Sebastian Moeller
2021-12-19 18:07             ` David P. Reed
2021-12-23  1:17               ` Aaron Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKiAkGRDwkH0yW0buxdUGyktE9XCT9RjospS=mbs_TfXWKh5Sg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=joel@aenertia.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=dpreed@deepplum.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox