From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-x22b.google.com (mail-yw0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 997373B29E for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 18:58:50 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-yw0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y187so7403518ywd.12 for ; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:58:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aenertia.net; s=dkimaenertianet; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Amzvtzna5JI1zEJS5GrXp8EF2myKNYPOJCP4C2nWaeQ=; b=Lpo89uQARRp6vSM+VfTnUovjzE1mnMSu0GLaadp/6hnrbcP68J8uERjJ9E4twklr2K VEZBWmLXccgHWxGLcSYc52GzwF3k3UD1Thk2qasFxzTxk5ei964s+x82tp+nb29VngK1 D4hUZvdtIhtsl3/yvoxiJm0528swNnQr0Uavs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Amzvtzna5JI1zEJS5GrXp8EF2myKNYPOJCP4C2nWaeQ=; b=lU20YizECmB0G9qJlCfOomJFrVYbEFZlhIftssXMTFBelTE6wFIPrgb9fq2fgXEwUt YrrTRRmRgETCivPe5r9NzIfpefoE3T0KoIGY4UNragdlT0KjCIF+A00DDHZC1AOV6Lj3 Z+UZUqcLYU+b6OD1oylCK7g5k3E3IJAQZVyYdaQem3kJ2UjQSa3JI3hxStdWiKkYk418 AvSjV4AUVufvHCTToyGr4T8zsGJeAseIXDm807eKq0PxZAeI8vjJokYjulwrUWbNK+ar E++u4JHNXW7b4Rqq+WBVm2jUcIhGFVAz7D4HIAatXr8sfXic4yTO3i+TrCafbsJW4jSF 2oMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4t/U4uAiDe7zYd2WlAq/jOIwiDyiPXsWawCbEKWW+Zm4zNwXq6 djOqfny9QPs34pL2VGiJMw0w90w4RmQVF/Qkx++kvCHe X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaXhUAHHn7GWSqBOoAEMT/u+pGdpgh7ehpc/U+Anenp8QY5bloHceRvs+OIfV3kOHiXhIABsYpY0Ruj3J7BmjI= X-Received: by 10.13.248.2 with SMTP id i2mr12277748ywf.448.1512431929827; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:58:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aenertia@aenertia.net Received: by 10.37.173.2 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:58:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8466a923-1d0e-fd3b-0fdd-42f4495c0581@lackof.org> References: <8466a923-1d0e-fd3b-0fdd-42f4495c0581@lackof.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Joel_Wir=C4=81mu_Pauling?= Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:58:29 +1300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jy_eQMs1AwN2hZ4bZiph2APSyWU Message-ID: To: Matt Taggart Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] quad core arm X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 23:58:50 -0000 Radio/AP co-ordination is something I sorely wish LEDE/Openwrt had. Run a VM on your server as controller and setup everything else as Drone AP's. On 5 December 2017 at 12:40, Matt Taggart wrote: > On 12/03/2017 09:44 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > [snip] >> >> Another goal was a largely fruitless quest to find the ideal next gen >> replacement for the wndr3800. These days I'm using a AC2600 as my main >> device and waiting for the ath10k support to catch up. I used to use >> an olimex something or other for my NAS, I upgraded it to a pine64, >> which was better but crashed hard a few months ago and I've not had a >> chance to go fix it. > > > RE: replacing the wndr3800... > Lately I've been thinking about a different model, switching to one of these > newer multi core devices to act as a central router running SQM/etc and > _no_radios_ and then deploying lightweight ath9k APs around the building. > Maybe something like ubiquiti unifi AP (non-AC) running LEDE? > Any other good and cheap ath9k AP options? > (hard to compete with the wndr3800 now costing $25 shipped, but an AP might > have better antennas and PoE) > > If/when ath10k catches up then just switch the APs out. > > -- > Matt Taggart > matt@lackof.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel