From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D760321F2FA for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id p9so46140lbv.5 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:23:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aenertia.net; s=dkimaenertianet; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eUTbY5suShvv7QqfuO62BZLx4BBR+M7sqEA7ep6FVVs=; b=PHsUOpOtpcxFjB8g1AXh2jYJvFnzlBBCu099dAvNq4/u9ToYiqOwyJr2lvLnQdST9g al2WpZzPb0UACzm4X9ZEWNHNI9H72ZXkRoisFxikiQxZ1LK3dV2W8IzzAZDl579zd7bi CpIGkB5ku/Y0axK7dg9Oq6u/kdrccpS9KKZcU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eUTbY5suShvv7QqfuO62BZLx4BBR+M7sqEA7ep6FVVs=; b=d48Q1EvV5xvWCUUbKRnndylHpKVSq0kT/LKYJIJCZ8jNX5sfWa0iKeWuZkJrGmQ+6U 8XXmGY+v5mlyKd41SgnopZHM4TT8lxkKATpoeWh/zIv2ZHYQU/riYJRHxRhTBJdPO5EQ 1cK2PGDgSafbpQeoAbqPhqRiy75sdl6ku0RKMfREShNw5yv88sOeRtyioALvan5rIOYm /GAiCw7wm3lq6vTc7ON8Cn2C3guJvBO3VSnOFPjQyS1Olu8YFD9OjjHtNQ+02OgSxKxo 6rgLXCpaD8RVXnybc2z+xb3LFv8ErySWxU8T6KNrasskdK22Syw5Gb/N22UXXFpuV2s1 yw3A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkiITenyssBO+t2/ZZXyFq4O8nVMLw8d8w5eHBWIv0AOc2IP69jRhNOTq1ZTFIK5nkBq+MD X-Received: by 10.112.34.210 with SMTP id b18mr13769113lbj.62.1412806980599; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:23:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aenertia@aenertia.net Received: by 10.25.16.220 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:22:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Joel_Wir=C4=81mu_Pauling?= Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:22:40 +1300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: aigM5ZW0s8Xc1kZzTj24KBNCz4w Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] wifi over narrow channels X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 22:23:32 -0000 IIRC only some of the ath9k radio's are able to do 5mhz channels - namely the enterprise chip variants. -Joel On 9 October 2014 11:14, Dave Taht wrote: > https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/nsdi12/nsdi12-final142.pdf > > I've had 5mhz channels working in the ath9k at various points in > cerowrt's lifetime. (using it for meshy stuff) After digesting most of > the 802.11ac standard I do find myself wishing they'd gone towards > narrower channels rather than wider. > > The netgear x4 defaults to a 160mhz wide channel. :sigh: > > The above paper has some nifty ideas in it. > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > > https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/make-wifi-fast > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel