From: "Joel Wirāmu Pauling" <joel@aenertia.net>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] edgerouter Xes and lede
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:21:22 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKiAkGRzeNGjjc1pyt5YqMK+k5A0SbjBSrYT-KJZyGUC76QSUw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5Yy+xAbWxFa=SEvW25HqjYw47JAuABtYFzH42JEQgsWw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3312 bytes --]
I've just bought a couple of n3160 Braswell boards as was getting sick of
poor performance out of the MIP's stuff I have.
If you don't care about the AES-NI instruction set's you can pickup j1900
based 4 port routers off aliexpress for under $100 (with intel 200 series
NIC's no less).
The n3160's you can get for around 100$ but the cheap one's only have 2
gbit ports (rtl's).
The n3160's are only 6w at maximum draw and so far I've had much better
results out of them than any of the MIP's or ARM stuff i've been using for
the last few years.
The UBN stuff has been recommended in the past but when you can shift the
l3 forwarding to a much more featureful and standard x86_64 platform and
just hang your Wireless as dumb switches off of that I can't really think
why bothering with the esoteric stuff requiring ttl converters to get up
and running is going to warrant more investment at this point.
No one has yet to produce a proper x86 AC router - you can kludge one
yourself with compex cards... I for one would totally buy one if such a
thing were available.
On 10 March 2017 at 05:45, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> For a long time now I've had several edgerouters in production using
> their default (fq_codel-enabled) vyatta based OS. There are also
> backports of cake available for it.
>
> For 50-80 bucks, they are a *really nice quad core mips box* - capable
> of forwarding at a gbit (and for that matter, can serve netperf at a
> gbit)
>
> But dealing with their 3.10 ancient kernel and foreign configuration
> interface has always been a pain for me, so yesterday I reflashed my x
> and x-sfp with lede's final 17.01 release, and:
>
> they are *marvelous* as lede boxes. Oodles of flash. The quad core
> works well. I'm mad at myself for not reflashing them long ago...
>
> It's a PITA to reflash them - you have to open one up, put on a 3.3v
> ttl serial converter, tell uboot to load a fresh kernel via tftp, then
> copy a lede image over that and sysupgrade -n to rewrite the flash...
>
> but after you do all that, you never have to do it again.
>
> (I should probably write a howto)
>
> I haven't gone so far as to try deploying one - I'm still benchmarking
> - but as I've spent a lot of time trying to get little hackerboards to
> push a gbit (only the odroid c2 can) - and for that matter, I can't
> get the linksys ac1200 past 700Mbits - being able to do it on a box
> that comes with a case, that runs lede well, that has a bunch of ports
> on it - is a win.
>
> One thing that wasn't apparent to me from the marketing and my own
> usage, which presented 5 separate distinct ethX interfaces in the
> vyatta OS, is that, on lede, it has only a single ethernet interface
> onboard, and does it's magic for forwarding with vlan tagging (it may
> well be there are actual separate ethernet chips on it or the original
> binary firmware emulated those, but....)
>
> I tested SQM to 200Mbits, that worked fine.
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
> http://blog.cerowrt.org
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4882 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-09 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 16:45 Dave Taht
2017-03-09 21:21 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling [this message]
2017-03-09 21:34 ` Dave Taht
2017-03-09 21:48 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2017-03-09 22:04 ` Aaron Wood
2017-03-12 19:43 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKiAkGRzeNGjjc1pyt5YqMK+k5A0SbjBSrYT-KJZyGUC76QSUw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=joel@aenertia.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox