From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21FAF3B4A4 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:21:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e128so24330292pfe.3 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:21:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aenertia.net; s=dkimaenertianet; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=XziZ1fkbj36YvaZzZp1MbBmfbPqZYr0rpLs4RvnsyQE=; b=Gw90odrjyZoWGm3lEpLUjFRZUMkHINZHnnESl5scrxKYyE5fRvCRgkVdl34alVeoTo twj24TfkmnfFNIm269EL94Z14PPsUalSZzWQUZvmLYlNVqC8xOiTs/7V4/NulBkd/dVg R4btiVTo689FwVcDKzEZ3uA6vfl1YqhR6y0Mk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XziZ1fkbj36YvaZzZp1MbBmfbPqZYr0rpLs4RvnsyQE=; b=PQHOMpfpAgoqYnbQluqTcIhKyyyTIRsHVAL8qm3+ZPknxNV/VQUoCU3vMRVKlVav5y LXgZQXPEa8GtH717YaDeg+nRr8dfges0jzpTobsdaf/Ocl5nUMAKShPZ2idSEND7fS/4 pRtXEDl25S5E+pkKwG4Vtl+t2KALxhKfwDyV5bYe4ndWdDgDB40MC1E0x3di40V8dtHl PIflVlCh/ACzOajuQa2cpSPLyEQTg2/jzuckQ8AH2N9icII19eUttM72BAQVzaykYeiE Y9/Z3Ll22Gj/1S3V/7mRkXNEabZ2L28Zkh1+i/RkRU3gs5r71nv56sbNQg9SncJFcfLx 3i8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWe3ILuyAhc53A1X1ikKMAHD1MAz50u8ZBSQWuq2R2LLTJNrfMAROdpFP0w/D5bkvRxbPe/l4kg2chRSw== X-Received: by 10.98.15.145 with SMTP id 17mr16807519pfp.19.1461205297340; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:21:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: aenertia@aenertia.net Received: by 10.66.6.66 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:21:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <9146.1461194647@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <13261.1461203888@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Joel_Wir=C4=81mu_Pauling?= Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:21:17 +1200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: V_xcS27DM8UhMBctIAFMfW6FZXM Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Cc: Valdis Kletnieks , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1139646ab130a30530f55e70 Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] OK, what's the current recommendation(s)? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:21:38 -0000 --001a1139646ab130a30530f55e70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am using a TP-Link ac1750 off a Shaw CMT 150/10mbit without issues using fq_codel and minimal tweaking. I had a wndr3800 before that and concur it's too underpowered. I drive AC wifi to the internet at the wan rate so can't complain. I know tp-link have recently come under fire, but if you can find the older (v2) versions that don't have the b0rked uboot due to the FCC they make great sub 100$ routers. -Joel On 21 April 2016 at 14:17, Dave Taht wrote: > I have been using the following "advanced" openwrt build, which > includes a slightly older version of cake at the moment > (I just reflashed the linksys 1200ac I have with the latest) > > https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=3D50914 > > sigh: > > the latest tc-adv, and cake need to get pushed up into it. It also has > some advanced features that are "intersting" like tor support and it > uses dnscrypt by default.... > > has babeld 1.7.1, hnetd, etc available, for the brave. > > I will do some benchmarks later today. > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:58 PM, wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:48:51 -0700, Dave Taht said: > > > >> Can't recommend anything at $100 at the moment. The linksys 1200ac > >> comes closest. I have one running on a 125/25 connection using cake > >> just fine - but I can still pretty easily crash it on the wifi as of > >> openwrt trunk from a month back. The wifi is great while it lasts > >> tho.... > > > > Thanks for the pointer, poked around on Amazon and the OpenWRT site, th= e > 1200AC > > looks like a workable choice feature-wise and for my bank account. Wil= l > > probably go with that. > > > > Will probably flash the 3800 with openwrt 15.05 and benchmark it a bit > before > > I replace it... > > > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! > http://blog.cerowrt.org > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --001a1139646ab130a30530f55e70 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am using a TP-Link ac1750 off a Shaw CMT 150/10mbit without i= ssues using fq_codel and minimal tweaking. I had a wndr3800 before that and= concur it's too underpowered.

I drive AC wifi to the internet= at the wan rate so can't complain.

I know tp-link have recent= ly come under fire, but if you can find the older (v2) versions that don= 9;t have the b0rked uboot due to the FCC they make great sub 100$ routers.<= br>

-Joel

On 21 April 2016 at 14:17, Dave Taht <= ;dave.taht@gmail.c= om> wrote:
I have been usin= g the following "advanced" openwrt build, which
includes a slightly older version of cake at the moment
(I just reflashed the linksys 1200ac I have with the latest)

https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=3D50914=

sigh:

the latest tc-adv, and cake need to get pushed up into it. It also has
some advanced features that are "intersting" like tor support and= it
uses dnscrypt by default....

has babeld 1.7.1, hnetd, etc available, for the brave.

I will do some benchmarks later today.


On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:58 PM,=C2=A0 <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:48:51 -0700, Dave Taht said:
>
>> Can't recommend anything at $100 at the moment. The linksys 12= 00ac
>> comes closest. I have one running on a 125/25 connection using cak= e
>> just fine - but I can still pretty easily crash it on the wifi as = of
>> openwrt trunk from a month back. The wifi is great while it lasts<= br> >> tho....
>
> Thanks for the pointer, poked around on Amazon and the OpenWRT site, t= he 1200AC
> looks like a workable choice feature-wise and for my bank account.=C2= =A0 Will
> probably go with that.
>
> Will probably flash the 3800 with openwrt 15.05 and benchmark it a bit= before
> I replace it...
>



--
Dave T=C3=A4ht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
ht= tp://blog.cerowrt.org
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-d= evel

--001a1139646ab130a30530f55e70--