Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joel Wirāmu Pauling" <joel@aenertia.net>
To: dpreed@reed.com
Cc: Wes Felter <wmf@felter.org>,
	"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Fixing bufferbloat: How about an open letter to the web benchmarkers?
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:49:17 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKiAkGTwgoJvNJ_C+RUx5rLJDENJhu4p7nQO_TbOA_mNWMQv2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410485067.393724599@apps.rackspace.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2161 bytes --]

Changing to better test suites isn't the answer, I know I've tried a lot to
educate and push for bespoke test sites for our customers .

This is all about happy illusions on the user side.

This is a branding and markets problem. In NZ, 'the' site for reference
that users go to is speedtest. Because of that RSPs deploy more speedtest
servers on their networks and you end up with a vicious cycle. Get enough
user driven complaints and you end up having a user driven push to make
your network 'look good' by doing otherwise silly things.

So if ookla implemented a udp based test, changed it's statical weighting
and data mining methods overnight. At least in NZ that might help.

For the RSPs it is always going to be easier to modify a buffer or queue
somewhere. And that is going to make their project managers and
stakeholders happier straight away.

-Joel
On 12 Sep 2014 13:24, <dpreed@reed.com> wrote:

> The speedof.me API probably can be used directly as the measurement of
> download and upload - you can create a competing download or upload in
> Javascript using a WebWorker talking to another server that supports the
> websocket API to force buffer overflow.  (sort of poor man's RRUL).
>
>
>
> The speedof.me API would give you the measured performance, while the
> other path would just be aan easier to code test load to a source/sink.
>
>
>
> Not sure that would help, but for a prototype it's not bad.
>
>
>
> On Thursday, September 11, 2014 8:42pm, "Jonathan Morton" <
> chromatix99@gmail.com> said:
>
>  >
> > On 12 Sep, 2014, at 3:35 am, dpreed@reed.com wrote:
> >
> > > Among friends of mine, we can publicize this widely. But those friends
> > probably would like to see how the measurement would work.
> >
> > Could we make use of the existing test servers (running netperf) for that
> > demonstration? How hard is the protocol to fake in Javascript?
> >
> > Or would a netperf-wrapper demonstration suffice? We've already got
> that, but
> > we'd need to extract the single-figures-of-merit from the data.
> >
> > I wonder if the speedof.me API can already be tricked into doing the
> right thing?
> >
> > - Jonathan Morton
> >
> >
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3513 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-12  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-11 16:03 [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2014-09-11 16:35 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Pedro Tumusok
2014-09-11 18:19 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Maciej Soltysiak
2014-09-11 18:33   ` David Personette
2014-09-12  0:13 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Rich Brown
2014-09-12  0:35   ` dpreed
2014-09-12  0:42     ` Jonathan Morton
2014-09-12  1:24       ` dpreed
2014-09-12  1:49         ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling [this message]
2014-09-12  2:04           ` Jonathan Morton
2014-09-12  2:11             ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2014-09-12  1:48       ` Rich Brown
2014-09-12 15:24         ` Rick Jones
2014-09-13  0:19           ` David P. Reed
2014-09-12  7:17   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-12 12:16     ` Rich Brown
2014-09-12 12:55       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-12  0:31 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " dpreed
2014-09-12  9:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKiAkGTwgoJvNJ_C+RUx5rLJDENJhu4p7nQO_TbOA_mNWMQv2Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=joel@aenertia.net \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=dpreed@reed.com \
    --cc=wmf@felter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox