From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 605F421F199 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:56:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x16so509947vbf.40 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:56:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RiFDuj3oz4dDALV2oqynOFLhijdixYFN3ADEsGn2QDE=; b=TJDm47WVTDR6vWPJ4Unnsf7g8JOQK/qDyhz6G2jcHjEUt5x6UQ/KfkZbPc/V6LvQ6s Rcq7+0dE12TLQv/ZLrreUxIR9CJ31JCKrfx9ZxIFSUIT+ivB6lVL1ONuUa/O1RtRJbgy cdRvQ9IMH4hj6YtP1j1jMug/HaDQjBth20s68soFoIOwCucQnn2lFWD93wOhvT6qEnQC p7jHPL+cmt4aIR4VTBf8Ul+ojTz5RXyXjRZUjwMXpWySBpkE4YEJlyXxDUOhspr6iD10 Q/pGVISwhULbYnilAdz5cEI7oaWghhJXHeswc0QgaysKl+NCSK9JuB0pkGX4knSl9XpQ jSDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlPDnw5+MBMQEfeEJFmYBCTU/767wGc6SnTMOzo4b3RrILc9A0nAvRf/z/X36bx4X5WlJ6j MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.51.5 with SMTP id vg5mr556468vcb.40.1384653380009; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:56:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.109.134 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:56:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 20:56:19 -0500 Message-ID: From: Kelvin Edmison To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11335afcda557904eb55bccf Cc: Stuart Cheshire , cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Recommendations for cerowrt multi-ap at home? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 01:56:21 -0000 --001a11335afcda557904eb55bccf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Kelvin Edmison > wrote: > >> I've been experimenting with two WNDR3800s and meshing, and I'm > starting to > >> wonder if meshing is the right answer for a typical residential user who > >> needs multiple APs. > > > > Well, an alternative is to bridge or use WDS. > Ok, I'll do that. I appreciate the logic behind keeping 2.4 and 5 separate from each other, so I'm considering vlan-based back-haul from the APs to the main router rather than reverting to a completely flat address scheme. > stuart cheshire is starting up a project to make dns-sd with a hybrid > > proxy work right, so we can git rid of the klugey multicast forwarding > > causing this problem (on WAY more networks than just ceros, this is a > > problem on many campus's worldwide) and actually use the defined > > standard for dealing with multiple mdns subnets. > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheshire-mdnsext-hybrid-02 > > > > some code already exists as fallout of the homenet wg and was > > demonstrated at ietf. It works... > > > > It will be a huge relief to have this problem resolved sometime in the > > near future. developers wanted! > > Awesome! I would be happy to try to contribute. The build instructions I've found on bufferbloat.net seem to be out of date; is there a more recent description of how to get started? Kelvin --001a11335afcda557904eb55bccf Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Dave Taht <<= a href=3D"mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">dave.taht@gmail.com= > wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:= 10 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail= .com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Kelvin Edmison <kelvin@edmison.net> wrote:
>> I've been experimenting with two WNDR3800s and meshing, and I&= #39;m starting to
>> wonder if meshing is the right answer for a typical residential us= er who
>> needs multiple APs.
>
> Well, an alternative is to bridge or use WDS.

Ok, I'll do that.=A0 I appreciate the logic behind ke= eping 2.4 and 5 separate from each other, so I'm considering vlan-based= back-haul from the APs to the=A0 main router rather than reverting to a co= mpletely flat address scheme.=A0

> stuart cheshire is starting up a project to make dns-sd with a= hybrid
> proxy work right, so we can git rid of the klugey multicast forwarding=
> causing this problem (on WAY more networks than just ceros, this is a<= br> > problem on many campus's worldwide) and actually use the defined > standard for dealing with multiple mdns subnets.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheshire-mdnsext-hybri= d-02
>
> some code already exists as fallout of the homenet wg and was
> demonstrated at ietf. It works...
>
> It will be a huge relief to have this problem resolved sometime in the=
> near future. developers wanted!

Awesome!=A0 I would be happy to try to co= ntribute.=A0 The build instructions I've found on bufferbloat.net seem to be out of date; is there a more r= ecent description of how to get started?=A0

Kelvin
--001a11335afcda557904eb55bccf--