Re: [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR3800 improvements?

[Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1382 bytes --]

I thought it did better than that with Cake?

-Aaron

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Dave Täht <dave@taht.net> wrote:

>
>
> On 12/13/16 4:58 PM, Matt Taggart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I love the WNDR3800 platform, it's been great over the years first with
> > cerowrt and then openwrt. Of the many I've deployed I have only had
> > hardware problems with 2 of them, and usually uptimes go over 100 days.
> You
> > can also still buy them used for $20 w/free shipping on amazon!
> >
> > With the recent improvement for cake,  make-wifi-fast, driver
> improvements,
> > etc is there any chance in seeing some of these things land for the
> > WNDR3800 specifically? It would be really nice if this hardware could
> > continue to do SQM, etc for some of the faster broadband speeds the cable
> > providers are offering (comcast xfinity has 100, 200, 250 plans now) and
> > see some of the wifi improvements too.
>
> We already support the 3800, although it peaks at 60 mbits of inbound
> rate shaping. If your primary use case is wifi, with the latest fq_codel
> code, you can live without inbound shaping and probably get 150mbits
> well managed.
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2043 bytes --]