From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2C93B260 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:26:34 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-oi0-x231.google.com with SMTP id b126so9662039oia.2 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:26:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=u1MT4nDAM2kL5Ys9etx4TyBgA3PojGy15yt8WNOF5uo=; b=DfdLAbhxXeFEO7aBohf/5jb3E83rWohmItUfUdmdAvzU/FISa5g8E31R5RfCrTPRqr tag4ynw+9MvRZaTbNhYJMKheisYhPYpRgRWKjx8BQDHts+LnKoDUYGQeWbNnTzWQm9mW 7j9EeLdgaWMb93ZkxN9B5WdjFvXL0/c8V45rYd5pBpru+h4IG5F9T+Buywh5/bPaZW1K KGLRvYSDQt13u6ilhBrPy4p6BVjiJKzKbjzoyMJaDbIJyFw+WkMdDN2d5KzfQ5E6QAoE aPFeOwXbvVncFc1fq0vkU0bln7uAxKUwPZLKs7mZnztvNhyQd7yoHnDW2ibGmz6ee58C hPrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u1MT4nDAM2kL5Ys9etx4TyBgA3PojGy15yt8WNOF5uo=; b=YYjGlJIfk36pvceOOPwZT0T2OHZNdPitDtdo/SXQiOgI22ZGh0BVbBKG9yJL/R6AIC jE1FYioAicM2Li5nyxuw+k9qxDN4kDHc6MNvAYy4YGfQYRBLmn3F3BHYWcAedvKIys1Q 9tRnIgnXS5LXjSNHqC3D/LGmgtIcWucMAJY7gYdr005tDC+Pe6GlB1d5kUXRBHRUDPAf uiq9XjW3X6FbzXhaw56IZJAZN25svJfgHgPnIbxImKeci/nDi2cVq63+0Xtw/ZdlE7Zo NhiTK1oIEBe6wZayXSszIGbJ15LZn0Rn9iOxVq6jeuONmmEbDvsyxWvF4cj1pgijn8c/ dzIA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00baiT41ROvJcH4QKgH4w7BvJWU7dAIBJJVMnQfO2cRmftD8tE9y0pHbncF+0OfO2CI6Id4nFaOUJX+XQ== X-Received: by 10.157.10.197 with SMTP id 63mr52267325otq.99.1481693193825; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:26:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.28.9 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:26:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <374ac0b8-aee0-74bb-d6e9-7eacb43a12d2@taht.net> References: <20161214005800.08268202@taggart.lackof.org> <374ac0b8-aee0-74bb-d6e9-7eacb43a12d2@taht.net> From: Aaron Wood Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:26:33 -0800 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Dave_T=C3=A4ht?= Cc: cerowrt-devel Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c033a3e7bfba90543979480 Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR3800 improvements? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 05:26:34 -0000 --94eb2c033a3e7bfba90543979480 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I thought it did better than that with Cake? -Aaron On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Dave T=C3=A4ht wrote: > > > On 12/13/16 4:58 PM, Matt Taggart wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I love the WNDR3800 platform, it's been great over the years first with > > cerowrt and then openwrt. Of the many I've deployed I have only had > > hardware problems with 2 of them, and usually uptimes go over 100 days. > You > > can also still buy them used for $20 w/free shipping on amazon! > > > > With the recent improvement for cake, make-wifi-fast, driver > improvements, > > etc is there any chance in seeing some of these things land for the > > WNDR3800 specifically? It would be really nice if this hardware could > > continue to do SQM, etc for some of the faster broadband speeds the cab= le > > providers are offering (comcast xfinity has 100, 200, 250 plans now) an= d > > see some of the wifi improvements too. > > We already support the 3800, although it peaks at 60 mbits of inbound > rate shaping. If your primary use case is wifi, with the latest fq_codel > code, you can live without inbound shaping and probably get 150mbits > well managed. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --94eb2c033a3e7bfba90543979480 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I thought it did better than that with Cake?

-Aaron

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Dave T=C3=A4ht &l= t;dave@taht.net><= /span> wrote:


On 12/13/16 4:58 PM, Matt Taggart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I love the WNDR3800 platform, it's been great over the years first= with
> cerowrt and then openwrt. Of the many I've deployed I have only ha= d
> hardware problems with 2 of them, and usually uptimes go over 100 days= . You
> can also still buy them used for $20 w/free shipping on amazon!
>
> With the recent improvement for cake,=C2=A0 make-wifi-fast, driver imp= rovements,
> etc is there any chance in seeing some of these things land for the > WNDR3800 specifically? It would be really nice if this hardware could<= br> > continue to do SQM, etc for some of the faster broadband speeds the ca= ble
> providers are offering (comcast xfinity has 100, 200, 250 plans now) a= nd
> see some of the wifi improvements too.

We already support the 3800, although it peaks at 60 mbits of inboun= d
rate shaping. If your primary use case is wifi, with the latest fq_codel code, you can live without inbound shaping and probably get 150mbits
well managed.


>
> Thanks,
>
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cero= wrt-devel

--94eb2c033a3e7bfba90543979480--