From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83515208A7C for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id e14so4351864iej.3 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:23:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9R9fRQYPVhApTHe4IqrsIwDqJZZiE2xcycDXeQZULg4=; b=GIFh4ZT+//uoEThTtTOJQYzmh1KVAfcJ3gDlPKQ30tAJ3PP5lp+Rjtu5b+Gwj4TFyF Gt4ntaAYYQo8AknS6pO5ZI/Kws3NyWvd08wWQYnyzoxC1fTfjRc/7QDx9a+u5bpipyy+ lDSiR0odzd+2lkYQQNlXsN0zhE0Q0yetUtu0cAEUw3IXcOgiBVSzJnxfEXkY6npaKaMh Uhh7kNLYM/JULBpTcpLgKfB8cKTPopFUgLz37sRq/DXRQFe+NH9Ol6Dm1vOS6M2FTWaS gINGU6r0uE+ZJyhDPZhut4qM2dUme+9nC13231jPYd1iOxq5mxAFFg3O2Lvw+4Hv1NQF RKXg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.32.133 with SMTP id e5mr15826362icd.39.1390681415785; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:23:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.248.70 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:23:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 21:23:35 +0100 Message-ID: From: Aaron Wood To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec518664ec8a42204f0d13f69 Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] procd support for core daemons? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:23:36 -0000 --bcaec518664ec8a42204f0d13f69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > of the other commonly installed ones, there are samba, openwrt, > strongswan and ipsec, that I know of. All these are packages that > haven't been installed or tested for a while (by me, anyway)... > I have strongswan running on my 3800 with v3.10.24-8. I've found some interesting results comparing it against another platform I have. I may (or may not) have found some bufferbloat-ish behavior in IPSec (where it forms a bottleneck doing the encryption/decryption). More on that when I get clearer results. -Aaron --bcaec518664ec8a42204f0d13f69 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
of the other commonly installed ones, there are = samba, openwrt,
strongswan and ipsec, that I know of. All these are packages that
haven't been installed or tested for a while (by me, anyway)...

I have strongswan running on my 3800 with v3.1= 0.24-8. =A0I've found some interesting results comparing it against ano= ther platform I have. =A0I may (or may not) have found some bufferbloat-ish= behavior in IPSec (where it forms a bottleneck doing the encryption/decryp= tion). =A0More on that when I get clearer results.

-Aaron
--bcaec518664ec8a42204f0d13f69--