Well, I'm seeing the same results as you are from here in Paris (using Free.fr). -Aaron On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 24/04/14 11:49, Aaron Wood wrote: > > > > >> Dnsmasq does the DS query next because the answer to the A query comes > >> back unsigned, so dnsmasq is looking for a DS record that proves this is > >> OK. It's likely that Verisign does that top-down (starting from the > >> root) whilst dnsmasq does it bottom up. Hence Verisign never finds the > >> broken DS, whilst dnsmasq does. > >> > >> That's as good an analysis as I can produce right now. Anyone who can > >> shed more light, please do. > >> > >> (And yes, please report DNSSEC problems on the dnsmasq-discuss list for > >> preference.) > >> > > > > This is still persisting (and it appears to be blocking a bunch of Apple > > software update functions). From your comments, Simon, it sounds like > you > > think this is an Akamai issue, and should be reported to them? > > > > I'm not absolutely sure that this isn't also a dnsmasq problem, and > DNSSEC is still capable of surprising me, but I can't see how a SERVFAIL > answer to > > dig @8.8.8.8 DS e3191.dscc.akamaiedge.net.0.1.cn.akamaiedge.net > > can not be either a Google ('cause it's their recursive server) or > Akamai problem. > > Poking further, it looks like the authoritative name servers for that > zone are > > ; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> @8.8.8.8 NS cn.akamaiedge.net > ; (1 server found) > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 43031 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 9, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;cn.akamaiedge.net. IN NS > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > cn.akamaiedge.net. 299 IN NS n7cn.akamaiedge.net. > cn.akamaiedge.net. 299 IN NS n6cn.akamaiedge.net. > cn.akamaiedge.net. 299 IN NS n0cn.akamaiedge.net. > cn.akamaiedge.net. 299 IN NS n2cn.akamaiedge.net. > cn.akamaiedge.net. 299 IN NS n5cn.akamaiedge.net. > cn.akamaiedge.net. 299 IN NS n4cn.akamaiedge.net. > cn.akamaiedge.net. 299 IN NS n3cn.akamaiedge.net. > cn.akamaiedge.net. 299 IN NS n1cn.akamaiedge.net. > cn.akamaiedge.net. 299 IN NS n8cn.akamaiedge.net. > > and all of those give sensible answers for > > DS e3191.dscc.akamaiedge.net.0.1.cn.akamaiedge.net > > except n8cn.akamaiedge.net, which isn't responding, so I rather think > this may be a Google mess. > > Or maybe it's Great Firewall induced breakage? > > Cheers, > > > Simon. > > > >