From: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, "David P. Reed" <dpreed@reed.com>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:30:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALQXh-Nd4E7Yp4mGaMg1GA4Zr=-5JrWkGvo_mOCChWWzfO3V9w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2DE7C829-5C11-4B9A-B8FD-10029918A7FA@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3801 bytes --]
I've done the same setup in the past with my 3800, and htb limits just fine
to 10Mbps even when used with gigabit lab links.
So I think that, for whatever reason, htb just isn't functioning.
Dumping the qdiscs setup and stats using tc should make it clearer as to
what the state of things actually is.
-Aaron
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:25 Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>
> On Oct 24, 2015, at 18:34 , David P. Reed <dpreed@reed.com> wrote:
>
> > Not trying to haggle.
>
> Sorry, I was a bit to grumpy for unrelated reasons.
>
> > Just pointing out that this test configuration has a very short RTT.
> maybe too short for our SQM to adjust to.
>
> That could be, but I believe people have tested fq_codel and sqm
> with similar setups and generally got dozens of milliseconds induced delay,
> not multiple seconds. So sure sqm might not for the best thing but it
> should deliver a reasonable compromise. Now, I believe Toke has a test bed
> where he can vary the transmission delay so he might know already whether
> sqm has issues with 1GE lans.
>
> Best Regards
> Sebastian
>
> >
> > On Oct 24, 2015, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Oct 24, 2015, at 00:53 , David P. Reed <dpreed@reed.com> wrote:
> >
> > In particular, the DUT should probably have no more than 2 packets of
> outbound queueing given the very small RTT. 2xRTT is the most buffering you
> want in the loop.
> >
> > Let’s not haggle about the precise amount of queueing we deem
> acceptable, as long as we all agree that >= 2 seconds is simply not
> acceptable ;) (the default sqm will approximately limit the latency under
> load increase (LULI) to roughly twice the target or typically 10 ms; note
> that this LULI only applies to unrelated flows). The exact number of queued
> packets seems to correlate with the beefiness of the DUT, the beefier the
> fewer packets should work, wimpier devices might need to batch some
> processing up, resulting in higher LULI…
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Sebastian
> >
> >
> > On Oct 23, 2015, Richard Smith <smithbone@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/23/2015 02:41 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > Richard Smith <smithbone@gmail.com> wrote:
> > My test setup:
> >
> > Laptop<--1000BaseT-->DUT<--1000baseT-->Server
> >
> > So, given that the DUT is the only real constraint in the network, what
> > do you expect to see from this setup?
> >
> > Given that the probably DUT can't forward at Gb/s, and it certainly can't
> > shape anything, it's gonna drop packets, and it's probably gonna drop
> them in
> > Rx, having overrun the Rx-queue (so tail-drop). If there is too much ram
> > (bufferbloated), then you'll see different results...
> >
> > Setting ingress/egress to 10Mbit/s I expected to see the speed
> > measurements bounce around those limits with the ping times staying in
> > the low double digits of ms. What I saw however, was the data rates
> > going well past 10Mbit limit and pings up to 2000 ms.
> >
> > This is what I've seen in prior rrul testing using a the 50/10 cable
> > link at our office and my 25(ish)/6 link at my apartment and a well
> > connected server on the net. That however was using QoS and not SQM.
> >
> > Its that a reasonable expectation?
> >
> > -- Sent with K-@ Mail - the evolution of emailing.
> >
> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> >
> >
> > -- Sent with K-@ Mail - the evolution of emailing.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4980 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-24 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-23 16:10 Richard Smith
2015-10-23 16:13 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-23 16:21 ` Rich Brown
2015-10-23 16:45 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 16:43 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 17:42 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 17:15 ` David Lang
2015-10-23 17:02 ` Alan Jenkins
2015-10-23 17:30 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 17:50 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 17:45 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 17:22 ` Aaron Wood
2015-10-23 17:47 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 17:48 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 17:57 ` David Lang
2015-10-23 19:08 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 17:38 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 18:05 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 18:41 ` Michael Richardson
2015-10-23 20:18 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-23 22:48 ` David P. Reed
2015-10-24 7:59 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-23 22:51 ` Aaron Wood
2015-10-23 22:53 ` David P. Reed
2015-10-24 8:07 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-24 16:34 ` David P. Reed
2015-10-24 16:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-10-24 18:58 ` David P. Reed
2015-10-25 23:21 ` David Lang
2015-10-26 9:53 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-10-24 17:24 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-24 17:30 ` Aaron Wood [this message]
2015-10-24 10:20 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-24 17:21 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-25 15:10 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-25 16:07 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm (solved) Richard Smith
2015-10-25 17:36 ` Rich Brown
2015-10-25 20:02 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-25 20:33 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-25 20:44 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 11:17 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-10-26 12:35 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 11:50 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-26 12:27 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 13:41 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-26 13:48 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-26 18:15 ` David Lang
2015-10-26 18:26 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-26 18:31 ` David Lang
2015-10-26 21:01 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 22:23 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 13:50 ` [Cerowrt-devel] ***UNCHECKED*** " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-10-26 14:30 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-26 21:54 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-26 22:04 ` Richard Smith
2015-10-25 20:07 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-25 21:50 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-10-25 22:44 ` Richard Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALQXh-Nd4E7Yp4mGaMg1GA4Zr=-5JrWkGvo_mOCChWWzfO3V9w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=woody77@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dpreed@reed.com \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox