From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D09C221F316 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id h15so3159924igd.14 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:01:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XFwGsIcQMcyy6MApzvsVA8Y+3M/GSwHaGcBZSSIjYqQ=; b=w7HXgwIMquLZcch9QTYhsvp4HccFRHKX/8Ij7rjhzcjTnQsT/R1YTwvRtoG7x0qpYR 1AWTFqmJke0qtdom6diz5h+cI/L3HjYt69YQFaDpIozo3+Z2mU2cWZqIEDQPKGwC0mZ9 2TSU7BqcNPX2i8ZbwBGd3aziubngRPTKA6QNMZEGiEAK/lwMLzjj4F8z7XejeYMJuqXa vfnrUd8ANJlWE47BKOs2GfPyycL40Hk513DYc/e1WB/4LXH9ujCeEuTqiyomsXF1tT6S mUT9ZQeWN7ZzThN4ftnkwk+1r1AFrpsl2ucf6DBQLVOPNZ4GNJf5UxuKFa5U0xSkjwu1 6udg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.162.71 with SMTP id w7mr53470688icx.50.1405004505133; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.59.170 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:01:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53BEA813.8000108@gmail.com> References: <53BEA813.8000108@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:01:45 -0700 Message-ID: From: Aaron Wood To: William Katsak Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba61527c6fb74204fdd81a1e Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Upper routing throughput limit X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:01:46 -0000 --90e6ba61527c6fb74204fdd81a1e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It depends on the aqm rules that are configured. In the base setup, it struggles at 50Mbps. But that can be increased by switching from the simple.qos script to simplest.qos (I'm not sure where the limit is with the simplest.qos script. I know that Dave Taht has been working with some other platforms. The Ubiquity EdgeRouter Lite may be able to hit 100Mbps, but it doesn't run CeroWRT itself, it just supports similar configuration. -Aaron On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:49 AM, William Katsak wrote: > Hello, > > Does anyone have a good sense of the most throughput our 3800s with Cero > can push through the WAN interface? Are we good to 100 mbps? 1gbps? > > Thanks, > Bill Katsak > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --90e6ba61527c6fb74204fdd81a1e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It depends on the aqm rules that are configured. =C2=A0In = the base setup, it struggles at 50Mbps. =C2=A0But that can be increased by = switching from the simple.qos script to simplest.qos (I'm not sure wher= e the limit is with the simplest.qos script.

I know that Dave Taht has been working with some other platf= orms. =C2=A0The Ubiquity EdgeRouter Lite may be able to hit 100Mbps, but it= doesn't run CeroWRT itself, it just supports similar configuration.

-Aaron


On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:49 AM, William Katsak <= wkatsak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

Does anyone have a good sense of the most throughput our 3800s with Cero ca= n push through the WAN interface? Are we good to 100 mbps? 1gbps?

Thanks,
Bill Katsak
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Ce= rowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

--90e6ba61527c6fb74204fdd81a1e--