From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99D2021F1C9 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qkbp125 with SMTP id p125so32338368qkb.2 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:32:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qOUTw9BmNQttwRxZ68hjEcUonNyFoLR4ADuwpzfgwCs=; b=QNI4FjF8mchkRrhOFNTS1TJQZrK8hGwt+Ibw7w55x2RbS2QdnKu7MG461o+wAs5oEG cqcmBNZTY3cbYcG5cCj2SBOBoK5l+dWzHRfDhg7xk3vbMTRfh/XBmi50D0J2cQ8npspl pI9IWTbQEABQgxHOZKu5UK5nR8lWrzVgj57Lt5BhLaJX7E3WChxeF82CiSCzMvow0nNP IeScUlNJsRO2jem1+aKt9iPIvL+IRfXxCb399jaxZi1vhXNuzmKwAz1VbfYwdVYS1RWU 15myYgrqsjNRwSS7HRQ87DX301W/OcRPFR92NrzD2C3K6+pnOBNcVCRzgy+AfZYmBDjv sNjg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.43.170 with SMTP id r42mr93632508qkr.95.1435203127241; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:32:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.187.71 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:32:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <26463A88-821B-44B7-A728-64BCB0B7C7BB@gmx.de> <55847E32.9000405@gmail.com> <5584823E.4040207@gmail.com> <0129B5FB-9D1B-45FF-84CA-492A6A0B638B@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:32:07 -0700 Message-ID: From: Aaron Wood To: Mikael Abrahamsson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114962e09472aa05194f447a Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 03:32:36 -0000 --001a114962e09472aa05194f447a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Aaron Wood wrote: > > Here's a long-range (indoors) test result with the 1900AC. I have about >> 9dB snr at the client (all the way across my house, which has plaster >> walls): >> > > Is this over a 25/5 Internet connection? Because I wouldn't imagine that > you would get any significant buffering on the wifi with that kind of > Internet access speed. I regularily get hundreds of megabit/s over 802.11ac > wifi. > Comcast cable, with ~150Mbps down and 12Mbps up. here's a close-range result for comparison: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/675012 > Also, I guess this is WRT1900ACv1? Running what OS? Yep, running OpenWRT CC RC1, with sqm-scripts installed, setup as in: http://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2015/06/sqmscripts-before-and-after-at-160mbps.html -Aaron --001a114962e09472aa05194f447a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmik= e@swm.pp.se> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Aar= on Wood wrote:

Here's a long-range (indoors) test result with the 1900AC.=C2=A0 I have= about
9dB snr at the client (all the way across my house, which has plaster
walls):
=C2=A0
 Is this over a 25/5 Internet connection? Because I wouldn't imagine tha= t you would get any significant buffering on the wifi with that kind of Int= ernet access speed. I regularily get hundreds of megabit/s over 802.11ac wi= fi.

Comcast cable, with ~150Mbps down a= nd 12Mbps up. =C2=A0here's a close-range result for comparison:


=C2=A0
Also, I guess this is WRT1900ACv1? Running what OS?

Yep, running OpenWRT CC RC1, with sqm-scripts installed, setup as = in:


-Aaron
--001a114962e09472aa05194f447a--