From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A8521F286 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 03:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hn18so634181igb.11 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 03:43:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/lHBF6X9c6FNcWcsU2HpiK1cDJGK6Td3Jktt+ihENHw=; b=oZ2Goy27+U7CENNtmcVShkRyzMYHmmuI7k7pmX42G6kvMUJBKEZ+6R0WQvnvniahtT mQq5RNnXFVoOWvHgYTLBdO/Kiy2tCM4v72BRCyB9uByEo+TQ1GB401ZixhyflhVT6CEa scYbV5ta4eWdyqPh8hqK7pNVoEHhND1Ey7eFRQXefgqo3jZvKIVwrpvXvHx4K+1aoEMu GbZ5R0w9T4oepzmqo1JHHFru9CfRUNR/aDmVlX2cGTmg0/2cSY40kK2CSSHSkiuP//LN iUpPJu40CrWLyz/SLVkQPfkhmGSQvjx28dFwsbLmddtFnrDmhoTWj+lPCtzaL1dVsRDA mLMQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.12.100 with SMTP id x4mr3028656igb.15.1397213015626; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 03:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.238.70 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 03:43:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:43:35 +0200 Message-ID: From: Aaron Wood To: David Personette Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0118238a79394c04f6c20114 Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.36-4 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:43:36 -0000 --089e0118238a79394c04f6c20114 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 David, I've been using both nfq and fq with a 16/1 DSL line, and never run into it, but most of my traffic is on the 5GHz radio, not the 2.4GHz radio. -Aaron On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, David Personette wrote: > I just thought of it now, but at Dave's suggestion (because of having a > DSL with only 4/.5), I was using nfq_codel instead of straight up fq_codel. > Could the difference in the nfq_codel code path have protected me from the > bug? Just thought that it might be a clue for Felix... hopefully not a red > herring. Thanks all. > > -- > David P. > > --089e0118238a79394c04f6c20114 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
David,

I've been using both nfq and= fq with a 16/1 DSL line, and never run into it, but most of my traffic is = on the 5GHz radio, not the 2.4GHz radio.
-Aaron

O= n Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, David Personette <dperson@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
I just thought of it now, b= ut at Dave's suggestion (because of having a DSL with only 4/.5), I was= using nfq_codel instead of straight up fq_codel. Could the difference in t= he nfq_codel code path have protected me from the bug? Just thought that it= might be a clue for Felix... hopefully not a red herring. Thanks all.

--
David P.

--089e0118238a79394c04f6c20114--