From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3FF3B2A4 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:04:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id n11so66658251wma.0 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 14:04:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U0VumEe7/1xqWICv+4UMKgFa7OsTn0UnbcNA4jCCjFw=; b=m03Ns20Fw7/Io6rw2N7pwghiIWitDhNYsl1IUcfGsihop11qjWTPWnz+qCziP0vH1Z tb3ef6/591cecA/MX2Qg1c2AoxzarNEZX5NiT6i/gdbpiY6mQhLQTNixo/AzOw/V+FrK sOhFIE1KcJjIytD+7MVxrtbqD+KYAUFC0K/1M7p2ahdPrJDGbqXHgnYDgDSu7uPVjM8h tIegFcyYZb6AhlUFPTRuqXlmU6DkgHc75Ho4Pl0o+x0R+brXUERyQZhtg8xne9gTJbiE BZovcexrul/9oIWcYT9w0g5Rkq22LeP03ylAPNusnVgbDzkfv8zd1y+V24G/g4ixUIq+ kIiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U0VumEe7/1xqWICv+4UMKgFa7OsTn0UnbcNA4jCCjFw=; b=laA0eUVgRGXlEF644Xx7omL2k+f9v+FFGNJU/wIz9KMKika0XPTiuYkkUdcB+iykfS RnG7Nwz+sJpeCV3MLxVUDtbJ/BhIQarc6z9blcBOEfCdWVzKyoBzCgf4Z9e9vBzNjT5d Gk2BVmbMJ5dnSJAxaQsmcYVZYe6d9yVI1ui0UumiMQGfWZjgy1EBLowQ2oQ3RIQweYEV jGROWjYsns+YzF/37qitlrOHMNjxk4TJDf2g71sx/r08RetUvnMImRqcPyM+mLJALLlw 3nU/3X0Fa7CFIKUM4tXPlsEsAeZ6atxGOTaxt7N5zjBEw81zKjxd/MmbRtpTDH3Hw2se vo9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nuuXs25uFFA/dskhEoK/rWrl6q74XIkghzq8v/eQtvj2rVPePTKcQLAtx1fCp4y79oOgU4gCFsRm4c/Q== X-Received: by 10.28.101.68 with SMTP id z65mr12111957wmb.102.1489097049902; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 14:04:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.129.209 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:04:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Wood Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:04:09 -0800 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Joel_Wir=C4=81mu_Pauling?= Cc: Dave Taht , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b300ab21736054a536ce7 Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] edgerouter Xes and lede X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:04:10 -0000 --001a114b300ab21736054a536ce7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > I am currently using ac1750's as my air interfaces and hanging them off > Ethernet over powerline or directly cabled via UTP and bringing all the > routing back to x86 based vm's for l3. > I would be wary of the ethernet over powerline units, they have been massively (100s of ms) overbloated in my experience. Those chipsets are really geared for IPTV and other latency-insensitive media streaming loads. -Aaron --001a114b300ab21736054a536ce7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=
I am currently using ac1750's as my air interfaces and hanging the= m off Ethernet over powerline or directly cabled via UTP and bringing all t= he routing back to x86 based vm's for l3.=C2=A0

I would be wary of the ethernet over powerline units, they = have been massively (100s of ms) overbloated in my experience.=C2=A0 Those = chipsets are really geared for IPTV and other latency-insensitive media str= eaming loads.

-Aaron=C2=A0
--001a114b300ab21736054a536ce7--