From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6275921F627 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ioll68 with SMTP id l68so131779475iol.3 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:22:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=L/JLlBPgWxsYWrxBQSsC3JiUFv5UDIUZj5Y3vK1y3Lc=; b=KSNgbPH4g3EBzf1Tcqmrt91NiR6RjT0VsSRVJfo4XLgBo+wx2IW0alKduXt+P6nS2x HeLQGL7vVxEY0LTNdBN0SM7uO9SLPrA9194uFoIMDFZDRHNWEbSGKTdd1gUUk/0bkRv6 mkp8N9pxA4Oae54qAIEei6/L7qwsdN/rkLhaI0qowUYfgES+y4TI/OOwGcb343nXFNED cy+qHGFtI1eJnfjmNG4UWeFSG9oxAwHdMZ3/c/KWi3UgqBr6pKRTdwcDoP0PxKvcnab+ 9rTgEe0wmnGuUQ/6qfc8H/CDcYo4FnONQW7qEOU4oZQks3LFChUy4Lc+8eSAgw5g3MtC jnxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.33.2 with SMTP id h2mr22467243ioh.30.1445620962307; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.120.141 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:22:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:22:42 -0700 Message-ID: From: Aaron Wood To: Richard Smith Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140e7b6f033b60522c8db12 Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:23:05 -0000 --001a1140e7b6f033b60522c8db12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > I have a shiny new Linksys WRT1900ACS to test. > > I thought it might be nice to start with some comparisons of factory > firmware vs OpenWRT with sqm enabled. > Here are my results with the same router (unless the WRT1900ACS is different from the WRT1900AC): http://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2015/06/sqmscripts-before-and-after-at-160mbps.html > So I built and installed an openwrt trunk but the results were very > non-impressive. Rrul test reported mulit-seconds of latency and it was > equally non-impressive with sqm enabled or disabled. So I assumed that sqm > in trunk on this device must not work yet. Then I wondered how well sqm in > trunk was tested and that perhaps its broken for all devices. > Trunk or the Chaos Calmer release? (I"m running CC RC1) > My test setup: > > Laptop<--1000BaseT-->DUT<--1000baseT-->Server > Which ports on the DUT were you using? are those local ports, or is one of those the "internet" port? -Aaron --001a1140e7b6f033b60522c8db12 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Richard Smith <smithbone@gmail.com<= /a>> wrote:
I have a shiny new Linksys WRT190= 0ACS to test.

I thought it might be nice to start with some comparisons of factory firmwa= re vs OpenWRT with sqm enabled.

Here ar= e my results with the same router (unless the WRT1900ACS is different from = the WRT1900AC):
<= br>
=C2=A0
So I built and installed an open= wrt trunk but the results were very non-impressive.=C2=A0 Rrul test reporte= d mulit-seconds of latency and it was equally non-impressive with sqm enabl= ed or disabled.=C2=A0 So I assumed that sqm in trunk on this device must no= t work yet.=C2=A0 Then I wondered how well sqm in trunk was tested and that= perhaps its broken for all devices.

Tr= unk or the Chaos Calmer release? =C2=A0(I"m running CC RC1)
= =C2=A0
My test setup:

Laptop<--1000BaseT-->DUT<--1000baseT-->Server
<= div>
Which ports on the DUT were you using? =C2=A0are those l= ocal ports, or is one of those the "internet" port?
=C2= =A0
-Aaron
--001a1140e7b6f033b60522c8db12--