From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (mail-ie0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F147721F2A1 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 00:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id to1so2976657ieb.20 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:04:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=w8CNYQjwze9H7SVZL765HtQ6l67PnR3BLoXwEVkQMv0=; b=geNiWO/kYLbAZUWn7FfYgOYYuyf0AzMljEHdrmvUR0H+T0eIUvDTu/GpejQWZY8KpS JIPzoLgiPUyxHB3ma2W+sNo5KKPNcytuT+jKvvKPodkfn8ZwiG087L45kZw7/uzAkZRy B0LeFKXS54V24pQe9WKwjIm+kUpG0xEV/egXxnoDBMISPh4iSRX1SYV0sIzoXRzqTUW8 8AT3cpg4q6y2fdUwTaNT+ttwA5nJprFm98FUIasB/iGsskcSjOS7DGCquiP9cDtoCrsK ilGaycfwYmcFyMtKp0HjwPZpdzUCEBHTAtFY7UskFyla1rukvtkcWjQSNihaSdM3xZfO J+bQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.170.130 with SMTP id am2mr1282596igc.15.1396595073249; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.238.70 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 00:04:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <533DA665.2050305@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:04:33 +0200 Message-ID: From: Aaron Wood To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134bb3a3d0cae04f632211d Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.34-4 dev build released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:04:34 -0000 --001a1134bb3a3d0cae04f632211d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Aaron Wood wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Aaron Wood wrote: > >> > >> Up for 10 days on 3.10.32-12 (WNDR3800). Only have 2 devices that run > >> 2.4GHz, and it's only seen 2GB of traffic on SW00 in that time... The > 5GHz > >> radio has had >5GB of traffic on it in the same time. No problems at > all. > > > > > > And I also have both 2.4 and 5GHz babel and guest SSIDs all turned off. > > > > -Aaron > > Your clients are? > > So far there seems to be a significant trend towards osx being an issue... iOS 7 (a pair of iPhone 4's). Everything that supports 5GHz is using 5GHz. -Aaron --001a1134bb3a3d0cae04f632211d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On F= ri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
On T= hu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Up for 10 days on 3= .10.32-12 (WNDR3800). =A0Only have 2 devices that run
>> 2.4GHz, and it's only seen 2GB of traffic on SW00 in that time= ... =A0The 5GHz
>> radio has had >5GB of traffic on it in the same time. =A0No pro= blems at all.
>
>
> And I also have both 2.4 and 5GHz babel and guest SSIDs all turned off= .
>
> -Aaron

Your clients are?

So far there seems to be a significant trend towards osx being an issue...<= /blockquote>

iOS 7 (a pair of iPhone 4's). =A0Everyt= hing that supports 5GHz is using 5GHz.

-Aaron
--001a1134bb3a3d0cae04f632211d--