From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3673B25E for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:34:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id m188so11318832vka.1 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:34:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=trMN+XuQBQWPneklNNL3rsKRCUl6d1lQwjEDbODtUYU=; b=PSbLzmcG8LurIPkZuGtomDS2bGUhjaiDQebZNu1/+WeHWO0UI7DK+g6dvYfkCFvZj1 fPLthoFjIIU8vbsj1XgCwPZHIMpg+Z9ePAijNw7hAUReFzRRuGo9G5A34KuLCKzXwUe8 qFp0LRyMTR2iStpJFvAoNw1yhb7tqQqNDHiYrPmuZhvPvINdTS5ohNAn70YESOQSwpLr dLbTbCKvPM5DIIB0HoP0141UxrdaXDQDba9wqMGVsGV1y/7LZ+Pj5vlvcjbHH57Qt3XP Vdt7gQMSXhUISpOFtkUSjAONEali3Udcx90CSQOLz5E3xNvjuRl3DyBkNREyeQ9sZTh8 WTBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=trMN+XuQBQWPneklNNL3rsKRCUl6d1lQwjEDbODtUYU=; b=GnIKpP3U6yWWvpVKtLXlK6MBj9eIosPczRFAJ3AW9lKqiDgRLubur6PlbJef6oMKUB g8YQUjB3dlIkd6TaExO3LGU8ue2NQXF8nLglOje+DE5hI2pXWh1YbsNYlIocKfQUNjxI RzR2X8rWB+LjZ4BjpDknDvLIGpSrswiZr687FjjBIPZ1jmRA5ez2pVx03Lo5oCP81pvK NuWybi6bETVQ7SO/nVC2CDbzPEapWWDyNuMQdwME2zmguqu/sBMMkBGWD1LmIqxFtyEF Zj75CnoTLoUvYMR0l8AJc6HdfUjUXyCG9QjIjBwBYCyzvLyYrER0ExSogDfmIBygzmuA TUOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUC54HEb9gJ6fd6RKCxyY32AzyKVCSRJwckDvQBqQk0OewvhZsPZCvsQJp5LC4U+HLmUGvNKDPso6gahQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.176.2.65 with SMTP id 59mr5464589uas.16.1461796444498; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.44.70 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:34:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <57213763.7030602@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:34:04 -0700 Message-ID: From: Aaron Wood To: Dave Taht Cc: Richard Smith , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113c01d0cef11005317f01f6 Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] bugs using the 1200ac as a target X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:34:05 -0000 --001a113c01d0cef11005317f01f6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's behavior I've seen multiple times in the past, but I never had a good feel for what the cause was. -Aaron On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > run netserver on the router. It doesn't seem to matter what qdisc is > on the router. > > hit it with the flent rrul_be or rrul tests. (or just multiple netperfs) > > You'll see one flow completely take over the router in this case and > the others starve. > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Richard Smith > wrote: > > On 04/25/2016 11:56 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> > >> it has something deeply wrong in it at a gbit. In this test I'd failed > >> over to a faster link at a gigE to show WTF it does - one flow totally > >> wipes out the others. > >> > >> > >> > http://blog.cerowrt.org/flent/failing_over_faster/linksys_1200_majorly_he= adblocking.svg > > > > > > What's your test conditions? I'll duplicate the test on my 1900acs and > see > > if it's there as well. > > > > > > -- > > Richard A. Smith > > _______________________________________________ > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! > http://blog.cerowrt.org > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --001a113c01d0cef11005317f01f6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That's behavior I've seen multiple times in the pa= st, but I never had a good feel for what the cause was.

=
-Aaron

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Dave Taht &l= t;dave.taht@gmail.= com> wrote:
run netserver o= n the router. It doesn't seem to matter what qdisc is
on the router.

hit it with the flent rrul_be or rrul tests. (or just multiple netperfs)
You'll see one flow completely take over the router in this case and the others starve.

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Richard Smith <smithbone@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 11:56 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> it has something deeply wrong in it at a gbit. In this test I'= d failed
>> over to a faster link at a gigE to show WTF it does - one flow tot= ally
>> wipes out the others.
>>
>>
>> http= ://blog.cerowrt.org/flent/failing_over_faster/linksys_1200_majorly_headbloc= king.svg
>
>
> What's your test conditions?=C2=A0 I'll duplicate the test on = my 1900acs and see
> if it's there as well.
>
>
> --
> Richard A. Smith
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@l= ists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ce= rowrt-devel



--
Dave T=C3=A4ht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
ht= tp://blog.cerowrt.org
____________________________= ___________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-d= evel

--001a113c01d0cef11005317f01f6--