From: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Managed to break 802.11n (on a 3800)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:46:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALQXh-PETSVD9cTJLr-yfdwpypZgHnV6+XyTcDD3iNOaO-La+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AB9DEDB8-67D0-44A8-8F48-7971E8CF9685@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1192 bytes --]
>
> > The 5GHz radio on my 3800 seems to be in a very odd state. I'm not
> quire sure what state it's in, but it seems to be only doing HT20 1x1. And
> in a fairly broken manner at that.
> >
> > Running the rrul test (over wifi directly to the router as the
> netserver), tcp uploads were 25Mbps or so, but download was 5Mbps.
>
> This is with your mac? Try rrul_noclassification, macosx (at least
> 10.8) will not do RRUL fair to a fast host. Why I do not know… it always
> prioritizes the upload, as if it did not see/trust the downstream markings
> (heck maybe it is busy using all bandwidth for upstream so that it
> literally never sees the markings on the downstream packets..)
>
> About the other issue I do not know anything...
Sebastian, after sorting out the router, it's still biased, but far less
so, about a 2:1 ratio between upload and download.
Also, my understanding was that with rts/cts, the router was in control of
that aspect of things? So the AP should be able to balance those? (or
perhaps the swamped load on the router is interfering, I'd need another
full-size machine on the wired side of the AP to know for sure.
-Aaron
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1521 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-16 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-16 15:03 Aaron Wood
2014-01-16 15:29 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-01-16 15:46 ` Aaron Wood [this message]
2014-01-16 17:20 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-01-16 19:08 ` Aaron Wood
2014-01-16 20:10 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-01-16 21:33 ` Aaron Wood
2014-01-16 22:50 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-16 23:15 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-01-16 23:40 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-17 20:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-01-17 20:17 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-19 19:01 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-01-19 20:01 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-01-19 20:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-01-19 21:12 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-01-16 22:35 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-16 22:30 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-16 22:56 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-01-16 23:12 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-16 23:25 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-01-16 15:38 ` Robert Bradley
2014-01-16 15:46 ` Aaron Wood
2014-01-16 22:08 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALQXh-PETSVD9cTJLr-yfdwpypZgHnV6+XyTcDD3iNOaO-La+g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=woody77@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox