I _think_ it was the comcast keyword.  That or a +1 by Yonatan Zunger
(Google+ lead), which got implicitly shared to a wider audience...  I'm
glad to have gotten us some visibility into this (I started revising for
clarity as the exposure increased).

btw, I'm about to do those tests with PIE you asked for...

-Aaron


On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> aaron got 47+s and 14 reshares on this...
>
> https://plus.google.com/+AaronWood77/posts/NsyV9z3RMvV
>
> which I think is more than I've ever got. Way to go aaron?
>
> Was it the comcast keyword?
>
> One of the things that frustrates me, is even after all this time, I
> don't see more than 56,000 refs to bufferbloat on google when I search
> for the term. "Qos" gets a lot more hits,
> aqm not so much. Maybe in order to crawl into people's conciousness more we
> need to mention qos more? other phrases when people think of lag?
>
> Long overdue is a couple more magazine articles, but we needz more
> science first.
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>