Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	 cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] sqm-scripts on WRT1900AC
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 22:17:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALQXh-PeerhPiWEhqWdGtrHN-fDMuQzObsCXq=83k+644yRSEg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1352 bytes --]

All,

I've been lurking on the OpenWRT forum, looking to see when the CC builds
for the WRT1900AC stabilized, and they seem to be so (for a very "beta"-ish
version of stable).

So I went ahead and loaded up the daily ( CHAOS CALMER (Bleeding Edge,
r45715)).

After getting Luci and sqm-scripts installed, I did a few baseline tests.
Wifi to the MacBook Pro is...  broken.  30Mbps vs. 90+ on the stock
firmware.  iPhone is fine (80-90Mbps download speed from the internet).

After some rrul runs, this is what I ended up with:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/538967

sqm-scripts are set for:
100Mbps download
10Mbps upload
fq_codel
ECN
no-squash
don't ignore

Here's a before run, with the stock firmware:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/337392

So, unfortunately, it's still leaving 50Mbps on the table.

However, if I set the ingress limit higher (130Mbps), buffering is still
controlled.  Not as well, though.  from +5ms to +10ms, with lots of
jitter.  But it still looks great to the dslreports test:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/538990

But the upside?  load is practically nil.  The WRT1900AC, with it's
dual-core processor is more than enough to keep up with this (from a load
point of view), but it seems like the bottleneck isn't the raw CPU power
(cache?).

I'll get a writeup with graphs on the blog tomorrow (I hope).

-Aaron

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1960 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2015-05-24  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-24  5:17 Aaron Wood [this message]
2015-05-24  6:19 ` Aaron Wood
2015-05-25 23:55   ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " David Lang
2015-05-29  8:34     ` Pedro Tumusok
2015-05-29  9:09       ` David Lang
2015-05-29 10:04         ` Pedro Tumusok
2015-05-29 20:26           ` David Lang
2015-06-01  8:47             ` Pedro Tumusok
2015-05-24  6:44 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-24  6:51   ` Aaron Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALQXh-PeerhPiWEhqWdGtrHN-fDMuQzObsCXq=83k+644yRSEg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=woody77@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox