From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C1A921F17D for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:34:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id j1so8799382iga.2 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:33:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wowsoStujHeojiidRljE0oq+yoNkxlvqxy2KHFq28Hc=; b=iqLjf3t/KdbfQJk6dnIQ8BvFdEeEMBw2ynD1T/v/PvXMtV/nKZfzRCZUVOeg1OVKHI e/KYDtFv0rjuBqvvZ67SE/CrT5qy10NFwem/GYh7B+/6wKKYxprVWdkFV1Em8DEG57lV y1O4q5o+AxuWvhe9jaEHJQ+K0rxDR3D8r83q+8aVg24eBS+5cUhxKSLj3g0xtzf0aMLx kmTaobiDLErvnS8u9E4xE5JOB80By94Hcrb2pxDAPEo3PU0i4EEhlMj9R/B9KCU7iRLr 30MSOlt8/r+i8kHsNbySnQ0TteuHlWrRCDfkMutZY4mQgnlaLypsWLAtuf/Ex3OtPSiG S28Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.250.132 with SMTP id mo4mr10325844icb.34.1389908036077; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:33:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.248.70 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:33:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <957858c7-f436-47ec-a55f-d46c6441212a@email.android.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 22:33:56 +0100 Message-ID: From: Aaron Wood To: Sebastian Moeller Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3011df93c2d0f304f01d2e58 Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Managed to break 802.11n (on a 3800) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:34:47 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:34:47 -0000 --20cf3011df93c2d0f304f01d2e58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > I just checked again and I get crazy results for both RRUL and > RRUL_NOCLASSIFICATION: > Yes, those look a like my results (after having gotten things running). When broken, it was still imbalanced, but the overall speeds were 11g, not HT40 11n. (I'll put up graphs tomorrow) -Aaron --20cf3011df93c2d0f304f01d2e58 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= hu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi Aaron,
=A0
I just checked again and I get crazy results for both = RRUL and RRUL_NOCLASSIFICATION:
Yes, those look a like my results (after having gotten things ru= nning). =A0When broken, it was still imbalanced, but the overall speeds wer= e 11g, not HT40 11n.

(I'll put up graphs tomor= row)

-Aaron

--20cf3011df93c2d0f304f01d2e58--