From: "Luis E. Garcia" <luis@bitamins.net>
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] trying a pcengines box
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:12:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALnBQ5=zvvnWjhe0nyQufgNFGV-LYR01jsfgSoMkUx6t9UYrOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160420055843.GA9772@radio2.ebirdie>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]
I have both boards and can say that they both very good networking
platforms - the apu1 has the small issue of the Realtek drivers for the
ethernet ports, Pascal has solved that i the apu2 by going with Intel
ethernet ports - My guess is that they won't do a full marketing push on
the apu2 until the bios for it is feature-complete (it's very close now).
On Tuesday, April 19, 2016, Erkki Lintunen <erkki.lintunen@iki.fi> wrote:
> * Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com <javascript:;>> [2016-04-19 21:07:52
> -0700]:
>
> > http://pcengines.ch/apu1d4.htm
>
> May it be you have missed their latest apu2 board with a better cpu?
>
> http://pcengines.ch/apu2b2.htm
>
> According to their price list apu2 with 4GB ram costs the same as
> apu1d4. A strange thing is that PC Engines is a bit shy on telling about
> apu2 and only link to apu2 product page I could find is very briefly on
> the bottom of their front page.
>
> - Erkki
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net <javascript:;>
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1749 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-20 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 4:07 Dave Taht
2016-04-20 5:58 ` Erkki Lintunen
2016-04-20 7:09 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-20 7:12 ` Luis E. Garcia [this message]
2016-04-20 7:29 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-20 22:01 ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-23 0:42 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-23 1:00 ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-23 1:29 ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-23 1:39 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-23 2:31 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-23 5:14 ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-23 5:42 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-23 5:45 ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-24 7:24 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-24 16:50 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-24 18:01 ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-23 9:52 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-04-23 1:30 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-23 1:34 ` Outback Dingo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALnBQ5=zvvnWjhe0nyQufgNFGV-LYR01jsfgSoMkUx6t9UYrOg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=luis@bitamins.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox