Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis E. Garcia" <luis@bitamins.net>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] trying a pcengines box
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:01:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALnBQ5nT_ns1reWpqixN8VdvzixWF4sHQNPPAaFyx5rk_WbBRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4X8nMNbyiD6U2BkosqfB8SJgcMFRhYEjpn8HEk7tEJEA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2623 bytes --]

Dave,

The APU1 uses the Realtek RTL8111E - these have drivers that work better in
windows than in Linux. Mainly I use OpenWRT, ipFire & pfSense, but I've
also tested Ubuntu and other Linux distros on it. For the APU2 ECC Ram was
one of the reasons I bought it - server class components for less than $130
is a bargain on this small boards.

Regarding BQL - I'm unsure if that feature/functionality has been
implemented yet on the driver for this device, but I can take a look later
this week.

Luis

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> Does the apu1 have BQL support for those realtek's yet?
>
> I have always had very good results for the intel ethernet and they
> were the first to get good bql support. so +1 for the design overall.
> ECC! on home gear!
>
> what OS do you run on them? (I am primarily debian/ubuntu/openwrt, but
> in this case I think I'd lean ubuntu or debian)
>
> (it's very cool to have coreboot, too)
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Luis E. Garcia <luis@bitamins.net>
> wrote:
> > I have both boards and can say that they both very good networking
> platforms
> > - the apu1 has the small issue of the Realtek drivers for the ethernet
> > ports, Pascal has solved that i the apu2 by going with Intel ethernet
> ports
> > - My guess is that they won't do a full marketing push on the apu2 until
> the
> > bios for it is feature-complete (it's very close now).
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, April 19, 2016, Erkki Lintunen <erkki.lintunen@iki.fi>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> * Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> [2016-04-19 21:07:52 -0700]:
> >>
> >> > http://pcengines.ch/apu1d4.htm
> >>
> >> May it be you have missed their latest apu2 board with a better cpu?
> >>
> >> http://pcengines.ch/apu2b2.htm
> >>
> >> According to their price list apu2 with 4GB ram costs the same as
> >> apu1d4. A strange thing is that PC Engines is a bit shy on telling about
> >> apu2 and only link to apu2 product page I could find is very briefly on
> >> the bottom of their front page.
> >>
> >> - Erkki
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
> http://blog.cerowrt.org
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4059 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-20 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-20  4:07 Dave Taht
2016-04-20  5:58 ` Erkki Lintunen
2016-04-20  7:09   ` Dave Taht
2016-04-20  7:12   ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-20  7:29     ` Dave Taht
2016-04-20 22:01       ` Luis E. Garcia [this message]
2016-04-23  0:42     ` Dave Taht
2016-04-23  1:00       ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-23  1:29         ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-23  1:39           ` Dave Taht
2016-04-23  2:31             ` Dave Taht
2016-04-23  5:14               ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-23  5:42                 ` Dave Taht
2016-04-23  5:45                   ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-24  7:24                     ` Dave Taht
2016-04-24 16:50                       ` Dave Taht
2016-04-24 18:01                         ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-23  9:52                   ` Alan Jenkins
2016-04-23  1:30         ` Dave Taht
2016-04-23  1:34           ` Outback Dingo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALnBQ5nT_ns1reWpqixN8VdvzixWF4sHQNPPAaFyx5rk_WbBRw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=luis@bitamins.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox