From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <maciej@soltysiak.com>
Received: from mail-qe0-f53.google.com (mail-qe0-f53.google.com
	[209.85.128.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3286221F205
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id s1so1753124qeb.26
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:00:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=c/OytWr5fWaigvENDiueFHHCIzfWcHmthDczRk+tR9Q=;
	b=JOCIQyJ2NMSHGC8XJ102YbXFSh3qf79E7QP8r+5V2Bukr2Qu+aGs6XeD1Zk2pEPEgn
	I3Z8yRbvsB2sbks7dQdr21F/+Q+Wlb/GurvrXcih3u7tXZ7qYKEFcFglrBqlK1p7L2LL
	ijdRRYVtpRq2O/kc217Ki3IJRXr4Wo9yDwCnSw04ro/64aWml+wM2IQrZCjn4A8aXlqC
	s3TXsbEtkxRNLSnlRNHE08N44PmECeldxqBqaE0QKZforV8Yjy8tfmHzn6xw30lUl33S
	HdvasQH4C9NmSedAhNV4zcQuDFqBSknmOdeQvjfKqxNTxk8v6BYbdOLy/gsK5JQD2zJE
	UWKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8ZIvfPJHmilB+F4lc3n8JOhhuvzQQfK6y1bmpOsBVFHe8wCrLatEpy39LasGMua7qsSIw
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.161.75 with SMTP id q11mr28726143qax.69.1390230029754;
	Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.96.132.3 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:00:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [85.221.151.252]
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6PZk_5FZbgq0U_K9CL=xE9ZP+-U09HwkwNaDREjj4fOw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw6PZk_5FZbgq0U_K9CL=xE9ZP+-U09HwkwNaDREjj4fOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:00:29 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMZR1YAaHrcU9AyZZpHn293D-trB4keX8hbL79fCH9jWy4i1kQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Maciej Soltysiak <maciej@soltysiak.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] notes on going for a stable release
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:00:43 -0000

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> ** The wndr3800 is obsolete and fixing the next generation soon would be good
On wndr3800 being obsolete... I was asked recently for a router recommendation.
I wanted to say WNDR3800, but do we have anything better that is still
that hackable?

> But this past christmas everything was 802.11ac, running on arm. The
> ath10k is out and getting some love, too.
We still don't know the specs of WRT1900AC, do we?

Best regards,
Maciej