From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-f43.google.com (mail-qe0-f43.google.com [209.85.128.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F65421F1FA for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 02:01:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qe0-f43.google.com with SMTP id 3so138611qeb.30 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 02:01:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=P6SagE4/l0yHRdV786CbDJb6G1tOcpNsoahgrUXa8Rw=; b=jxCnZw3JKLHJ5q98qKguVsTwzG7gl0ZOx+ciBCxIyoEUPPyx+pWm65N4Vafcw8bb3c zY1uFEtaZvk+R59FRC0wmNct14X/XiEmDi4FYjD86DCL0N0Y0dH7iETQRts7ydXhNcz+ lIcwtBq9IAZAVGWNdTO36u+TYROPKT1pC3GDBZSIfAUiIPXc4bIc8ZTFhcGLCDWuHmr1 uP7DAChoqsZIHewpLbHlj/pambIoqu/gbitm0FJ5avmz6qJWcF1xJxE8KHgTjS2Nz7KE xzsN5bH3+znBx13ROuJYJEID8pqHCE098Gjty/7czqsog1A2+8xDth3K4QmU/6qLwaiG nD0A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFfdpEu7HpbqaB4nYlaKpl+5S5i5nn4xCcP9dvRkmx0Uxzf6CFS//qfpqrrK4lQwjoGv5V MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.129.65 with SMTP id nu1mr9266164qeb.50.1384509680014; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 02:01:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.34.98 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 02:01:19 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [213.189.36.98] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:01:19 +0100 Message-ID: From: Maciej Soltysiak To: Dave Taht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ietf report (Brief) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:01:21 -0000 > 1) The pie folk announced the selection of a variant of pie as the > default and mandatory *on* aqm algorithm for docsis 3.1 cable modems. > There is support for alternate algos, and nothing has been decided for > CMTSes or docsis 3.0. It's going to take years for hardware to appear > on this... Plus, there are other issues. For example, the docsis 3.0 cable modem I got from my ISP is a Cisco EPC 3925 that doesn't seem to be very hackable and there's just the Web GUI that gets the user/pass overwritten after some time after resetting it. Not much to tinker though. Question: I'm running cero with the 90% qos throughput trick behind this Docsis 3.0 modem. Does it look like in the future I should replace it with a 3.1 modem with PIE and stop doing the 90% trick on cero? Best regards, Maciej