From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com (mail-oa0-f41.google.com [209.85.219.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D537D201A98 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:34:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id k14so10222106oag.28 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:34:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Y/7NKhMKcWIT1QzDq8zR+uMy77TnBFswmLSmdoS+lTQ=; b=e2IHvKu1cVSjTTIcoydqiZQof1pgMDfaspmI0IEV7Dm3gaAyCqPU89uHa85oDNHnAk qz6WO/Jf7zDm9UI/YidU31rlz4mMv06ly7dtHK6KWzd4wNXz18sTInByntmV3MvVGu05 vm1ZBhV89p0is3hTKNHQ9FWGZSs50vg0p+n55yFnLa5ThORgVA8s6jNdBm4StHQsj5pQ B9VUvXTmwRPVF/bUB0Xk9hRAjdJxB05Yxw07wbGaHMbUUaBaOfYs/hamh+IPVTaM/040 NbHim8pSk6asgrbhWjIrnutX6s72OhdDmLdT7XKACtenN7mH/wbrBi/IdwMrdqueurZm i22g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.113.5 with SMTP id iu5mr28891965obb.36.1356737658630; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:34:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.82.73 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:34:18 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [77.65.42.67] Received: by 10.76.82.73 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:34:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50DDDD58.9090901@openwrt.org> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 00:34:18 +0100 Message-ID: From: Maciej Soltysiak To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0447f1883232a104d1f21a4a X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnY3rWA10LoyvnE4c4AiQvT6GYgYqghGwklDJAiFqlgjHr+i+C61TDVgJ2gD3l9KxDjDja/ Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Latest IPv6 Updates X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 23:34:20 -0000 --f46d0447f1883232a104d1f21a4a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Upnp works fine. Ssdpd doesn't, not sure why, it's late now. will test tomorrow. p.s. /use/shin/simple_qos fails on non-existant /etc/functions.sh Am I doing something wrong? Maciej On 28 Dec 2012 21:19, "Dave Taht" wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Steven Barth wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > the following updates / changes for IPv6 have been commited to OpenWrt = in > > the last days. Most of these affect RFC 6204 CE-compliance, some are > > convenience changes. > > > > Feel free to merge and test CeroWrt. > > I have merged with openwrt head, and updated to dnsmasq 2.66test4, and > also folded in the tiny luci upnp fix to the '&' issue. I'm not really > sure if that last is the right thing, it's supposed to be > translated... > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.6.11-4/ > > I am still not in a position to test anything cerowrt related myself > right now, although I am down to a mere 20 miles between me and the > yurtlab and 50 from isc. > > I am relieved to hear that amazon claims they will get new supplies of > the wndr3800 by jan 5. > > I am staring at the bunch of hardware I ordered in something of a > panic - dreamplug, wndr4300, the nanostations, a couple bus pirates, a > nexus 7, and trying to figure out a direction to move forward that > makes sense. > > > * Detect and delegate IPv6-specific MTU from upstream interfaces (e.g. > > tunnels, pppoe, etc.) and propagate them to downstream interfaces > > (supporting cases where IPv4-MTU and IPv6-MTU differ, e.g. 6in4, 6rd, > 6to4, > > ...) > > Excellent! PPPoE? > > > * Add a default null-route for delegated prefixes (CE-requirement WPD-6= ) > > This fixes routing loops in case packets with a destination within an > unused > > / unassigned part of a delegated prefix are received. > > > > * Added support for site-borders (interfaces which ULA-traffic might no= t > > cross) as specified in CE-requirement ULA-4 > > > > * Added support to override CE-requirement ULA-5 for NPT-setups (iirc n= ot > > relevant if dnsmasq is used, as it does not follow ULA-5). > > > > > > Documentation on http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 has been > updated. > > > > > > > > Btw. Simon Kelley released 2.66-test4 which fixes some bugs related to > > stateful DHCPv6 and should make it usable finally. Also the new > > MTU-propagation mentioned above is now supported by dnsmasq as well. > > I haven't tested it myself yet but you can try if you are brave. > > I folded in the same patches as were used in 2.66-test3. > > A good default configuration for cero would be good, Not sure what that > is... > > > > > I will try to make a table about the RFC requirements for Customer Edge > > (CE)-Routers soon which sums up which requirements are fulfilled and > which > > are still not implemented both for CeroWrt / OpenWrt with 6relayd and > with > > dnsmasq as RA/DHCPv6-server. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Steven > > _______________________________________________ > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --f46d0447f1883232a104d1f21a4a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Upnp works fine.
Ssdpd doesn't, not sure why, it's late now. will test tomorrow.

p.s. /use/shin/simple_qos fails on non-existant /etc/functio= ns.sh
Am I doing something wrong?

Maciej

On 28 Dec 2012 21:19, "Dave Taht" <= dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> the following updates / changes for IPv6 have been commited to OpenWrt= in
> the last days. Most of these affect RFC 6204 CE-compliance, some are > convenience changes.
>
> Feel free to merge and test CeroWrt.

I have merged with openwrt head, and updated to dnsmasq 2.66test4, and
also folded in the tiny luci upnp fix to the '&' issue. I'm= not really
sure if that last is the right thing, it's supposed to be
translated...

http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.= 6.11-4/

I am still not in a position to test anything cerowrt related myself
right now, although I am down to a mere 20 miles between me and the
yurtlab and 50 from isc.

I am relieved to hear that amazon claims they will get new supplies of
the wndr3800 by jan 5.

I am staring at the bunch of hardware I ordered in something of a
panic - dreamplug, wndr4300, the nanostations, a couple bus pirates, a
nexus 7, and trying to figure out a direction to move forward that
makes sense.

> * Detect and delegate IPv6-specific MTU from upstream interfaces (e.g.=
> tunnels, pppoe, etc.) and propagate them to downstream interfaces
> (supporting cases where IPv4-MTU and IPv6-MTU differ, e.g. 6in4, 6rd, = 6to4,
> ...)

Excellent! PPPoE?

> * Add a default null-route for delegated prefixes (CE-requirement WPD-= 6)
> This fixes routing loops in case packets with a destination within an = unused
> / unassigned part of a delegated prefix are received.
>
> * Added support for site-borders (interfaces which ULA-traffic might n= ot
> cross) as specified in CE-requirement ULA-4
>
> * Added support to override CE-requirement ULA-5 for NPT-setups (iirc = not
> relevant if dnsmasq is used, as it does not follow ULA-5).
>
>
> Documentation on http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 has been upd= ated.
>
>
>
> Btw. Simon Kelley released 2.66-test4 which fixes some bugs related to=
> stateful DHCPv6 and should make it usable finally. Also the new
> MTU-propagation mentioned above is now supported by dnsmasq as well. > I haven't tested it myself yet but you can try if you are brave.
I folded in the same patches as were used in 2.66-test3.

A good default configuration for cero would be good, Not sure what that is.= ..

>
> I will try to make a table about the RFC requirements for Customer Edg= e
> (CE)-Routers soon which sums up which requirements are fulfilled and w= hich
> are still not implemented both for CeroWrt / OpenWrt with 6relayd and = with
> dnsmasq as RA/DHCPv6-server.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steven
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@l= ists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscrib= e.html
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
--f46d0447f1883232a104d1f21a4a--