From: Maciej Soltysiak <maciej@soltysiak.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "Wes Felter" <wmf@felter.org>,
"Joel Wirāmu Pauling" <joel@aenertia.net>,
"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fixing bufferbloat: How about an open letter to the web benchmarkers?
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:19:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZR1YB0jXBUWf14ggfWMRE8Me__XJctWHaJ57p8HuSRJeYobQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7Zy2vwLPcV0cb9O1jj2QU_h6Vj2fHok9fm-X7-ssnStA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> If Verizon can petition the FCC to change the definition of
> broadband... why can't we petition speedtest to *change their test*?
> Switching to merely reporting the 98th percentile results for ping
> during an upload or download, instead of the baseline ping, would be a
> vast improvement on what happens today, and no doubt we could suggest
> other improvements.
Sounds like a very good idea. The latency would finally differ and
hopefully lead to more meaningful discussions. Or at least be grounds
to it.
> Who here would sign?
I would!
Best regards,
Maciej Soltysiak
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-11 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-11 16:03 Dave Taht
2014-09-11 16:35 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Pedro Tumusok
2014-09-11 18:19 ` Maciej Soltysiak [this message]
2014-09-11 18:33 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " David Personette
2014-09-12 0:13 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Rich Brown
2014-09-12 0:35 ` dpreed
2014-09-12 0:42 ` Jonathan Morton
2014-09-12 1:24 ` dpreed
2014-09-12 1:49 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2014-09-12 2:04 ` Jonathan Morton
2014-09-12 2:11 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2014-09-12 1:48 ` Rich Brown
2014-09-12 15:24 ` Rick Jones
2014-09-13 0:19 ` David P. Reed
2014-09-12 7:17 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-12 12:16 ` Rich Brown
2014-09-12 12:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-12 0:31 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " dpreed
2014-09-12 9:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMZR1YB0jXBUWf14ggfWMRE8Me__XJctWHaJ57p8HuSRJeYobQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=maciej@soltysiak.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@aenertia.net \
--cc=wmf@felter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox