From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yh0-f53.google.com (mail-yh0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99A7A21F2C7 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yh0-f53.google.com with SMTP id a41so12278408yho.12 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:19:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Wm3rM5Qc17xxVOht8Sl1YzaUqj6y+YRohvBgIknR6Xg=; b=UYWwBTmxcEx95/xdRCh6drzH7c7ZzDU60w6HyJbxetW04Jrd4fuOmy1tRB+KH+hCTZ 6T10uEl1TC9Iar/EROdj6lF8l61R6aFUZQ3lH/P5kmGk+7cCx1Qymb7f3zlkF9pVfyD7 G+Pngpx3E2TNWGryBpCpYVmdLtG50SpFG+FyvbhVUYyXv2Ia68Akw2p9UaGVhCeq/+PM IstWlm6ixkcmQdeO1MN4JNetaMnB1xvIKjwLyPDDKb+Zz4VW+RPr0SK6t+5Pbg5Sha6X dTQ8GtaS4XRLeXJl7WmtZxtaGTqIUu5IzbRVem5teoXdQOwJdAiQzhay9k5cw3Tg3Sf8 ndkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmCV1Wc990b152qEEzv3W6Ik8YF0UtM4QtS7mqNCuSJzJwz/lynC0fQkrUVxJZcZK56Qp+2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.37.3 with SMTP id x3mr3269893yha.111.1410459583079; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.216.212 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:19:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [85.221.151.252] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:19:43 +0200 Message-ID: From: Maciej Soltysiak To: Dave Taht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Wes Felter , =?UTF-8?Q?Joel_Wir=C4=81mu_Pauling?= , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , bloat Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fixing bufferbloat: How about an open letter to the web benchmarkers? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:20:12 -0000 On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > If Verizon can petition the FCC to change the definition of > broadband... why can't we petition speedtest to *change their test*? > Switching to merely reporting the 98th percentile results for ping > during an upload or download, instead of the baseline ping, would be a > vast improvement on what happens today, and no doubt we could suggest > other improvements. Sounds like a very good idea. The latency would finally differ and hopefully lead to more meaningful discussions. Or at least be grounds to it. > Who here would sign? I would! Best regards, Maciej Soltysiak