From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B46C921F16A for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 03:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgme6 with SMTP id e6so109719053wgm.2 for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 03:10:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=yciwn3izm8RuFkoyOEx5U8/cQZZymvVWR1YF63QNXwo=; b=DvklJFOF9z5qS+YeZnNeP1gf7XoL9M6EEfJVKNKzCP0I8PnnsjIL/fNsl1wRF8wsmh j0ejl4T7Y9B4chcBeRIroyxNN7YKrNxe6ysxMwL9IQXWAvnUAoLQIemHrzfvhc8Umz4S GnQlC3PLP2PHR7WOKqEIGe9AVnERuRpdT6wQI0kGXlnN6sWZsEoHChgpOoJFCmq1vzIz kAg3Jnb3ecwBy3itQpkW6Qj4Z0G1FkoRn9evjhz7L1yIQEC/tD5ACuso9zWxziuOzzI5 bto7ULOGA9+5rFBM5EIJ8cp89L8InS/QZo7H/gkKvQ59pkTl3Yf+Ghgh7zNcDyVzMiIK QoDg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkndopc25BfskE/ea2UfWO3uKunT6yBhDYVtq7+0YMmNQbqhU2UEFbdZ/CU1mPGzSSKCeBc MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.195.11.3 with SMTP id ee3mr40146503wjd.89.1433153400324; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 03:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.218.199 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 03:10:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [213.241.123.206] Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:10:00 +0200 Message-ID: From: Maciej Soltysiak To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b874e5055d84e0517720789 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] TCP Fast Open in polipo X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:12:25 -0000 --047d7b874e5055d84e0517720789 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, The cerowrt package for polipo has a patch to add support for TFO. I've moved to openwrt some time ago to see how they are doing and noticed they are not using the TFO patch. So I went to polipo github and raised an issue [1] to apply the TFO patch. Juliusz (the author) asked for a tcpdump to show it actually gives anything. Before I attempt to generate a tcpdump I thought I ask here. Does anyone have a tcpdump showing polipo benefits from TFO? Or can do one easily to support adding this upstream? Best regards, Maciej Soltysiak [1] https://github.com/jech/polipo/issues/62 --047d7b874e5055d84e0517720789 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

The cerowrt package for polipo has a patch to add support for TFO.
<= /div>I've moved to openwrt some time ago to see how they are doing and = noticed they are not using the TFO patch.

So I went to polipo = github and raised an issue [1] to apply the TFO patch.
Juliusz (th= e author) asked for a tcpdump to show it actually gives anything.

Before I attempt to generate a tcpdump I thought I ask here.
D= oes anyone have a tcpdump showing polipo benefits from TFO?
Or can= do one easily to support adding this upstream?

Best regards,<= br>
Maciej Soltysiak

[1] https://github.com/jech/polipo/issues/62

--047d7b874e5055d84e0517720789--