From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f43.google.com (mail-yw0-f43.google.com [209.85.213.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE48B200A20 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yhl10 with SMTP id 10so7450490yhl.16 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:07:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=aopiYesr6PmJpOoJuG3NxFmdkTvNceujJkRpBMTrtro=; b=XT/0uEFz1JMWcsMKexcuze0U+Fud74WXJtpHA2uI5DTSNJDx6fooZ+PKhhYrdBD63p qWFG2Tx7ACQWMKyIOfoTPqOswnDC9n+xUGOe1zy+qnwLhEEvwQbMsEld6ZlbtoMVDswj jO9jhiiO074zLrIphMy0GefAkD4UddS+6mAhycxg2ykswfZ5pjyB+5/3W2iYCUJHSChw 0brWY3Eufu0RQev5DIDnZe6DPp6vXquZOjJz0nhRcRxSgSg7ic9t2/1uNqbNjq552Kxp NTN23513+Ca1WYTsY+x1hF9CF2sNUfeCboUFAJOc3SaE7mSWgvQHdzTSOCZC6Kjgokrc pmYA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.202.8 with SMTP id ke8mr3605065igc.6.1342372043561; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.31.106 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:07:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [77.65.42.82] Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:07:23 +0200 Message-ID: From: Maciej Soltysiak To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04479ee5d0197304c4e1581c X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkUnHzq3HoaJTzAwtfbeEb/oQh6Bbon3jUliDBo0A44WsXUUW+awRzAiJQeJkFtIe55sTM2 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Different BIND setup per interface X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:07:26 -0000 --f46d04479ee5d0197304c4e1581c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi guys, I am thinking of having clients on my -guest intefaces to resolve DNS not from root, but from OpenDNS. This is to have the guests (which may be neighbors, neighbor's kids, visitors) to be able to use DNS that has some filtering ON: scam, malware, etc. I am OK to use normal DNS internally. Any thoughts on doing that? I know the Tomato build for WRT54GL allowed entering credentials for opendns and that worked. Regards, Maciej --f46d04479ee5d0197304c4e1581c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi guys,

I am thinking of having clients on my -guest intefaces to r= esolve DNS not from root, but from OpenDNS.
This is to have the guests (= which may be neighbors, neighbor's kids, visitors) to be able to use DN= S that has some filtering ON: scam, malware, etc.

I am OK to use normal DNS internally.

Any thoughts on doing that= ? I know the Tomato build for WRT54GL allowed entering credentials for open= dns and that worked.

Regards,
Maciej

--f46d04479ee5d0197304c4e1581c--