From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f42.google.com (mail-oa0-f42.google.com [209.85.219.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A71C21F0B3 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:39:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i18so3789882oag.1 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:39:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=DvGCpSFjWY5putUAnV2Ou0/jLUxP3r4ifIKodAjXiXM=; b=iKnYXpIxaNMrTJzRqD8u48+ZAcl2pCw90ab7Tg2Y2WEzxgsaqmVr1SdZ2sbXTXL81k LzYrzULdo6s2r8LDqHzYlW5PwHb6WgaCRaPC8IQy5SUJYyeziGI6kj26ghIc7PidhVDu aEBXF6JZspgab4wW1Z46kH0xOYQ8AA5Z05OOUlio9yeyJbdrYWTyBuHXeNGwqJ8zRaYF RZS79OfjiCqX//WUWb1K/0He+7HIVwlogE4rvv7ro30zCwZNFwr0El1MPNE2DEPyIkjP t8eE3FrabpBwMSk3pHvZyYtdAPactWfeA4BkwiscXNxpqBQA93gBR/vMxp0OITLXYEes qR9Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.118.104 with SMTP id kl8mr8886009obb.54.1361824774881; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:39:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.20.139 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:39:34 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [77.65.47.165] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:39:34 +0100 Message-ID: From: Maciej Soltysiak To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044786b5f468ff04d6928920 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmleBbha/yySfO8dGsC9B5nCZzBOZ+okN7RvFFJXwILd/cupZykH3Nfoc+oU0KfsI/U1HHl Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] collecting some data? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:39:36 -0000 --f46d044786b5f468ff04d6928920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > I have been collecting statistics on the behavior of the 3.7.5-2 version > of cerowrt, and perhaps y'all out there can help. I've been doing four > repeatable tests. > > I feed the attached file into the chrome web page benchmark and run it 4 > times: > > 1) No other load on the system > 2) while running a single up and single down netperf stream to icei.org(on the east coast) > 3) then while still loaded, after turning on simple_qos.sh, set for ~85% > of the rated up/down bandwidth... > 4) then killing the load, and keeping simple_qos enabled. > Is that good if I run the chrome benchmark from a win7 laptop on 802.11n wifi, while netperfs are going from the wndr3800? Regards, Maciej --f46d044786b5f468ff04d6928920 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com= > wrote:
I have been collecting statistics on the behavior of the 3.7.5-2 versi= on of cerowrt, and perhaps y'all out there can help. I've been doin= g four repeatable tests.

I feed the attached file into = the chrome web page benchmark and run it 4 times:

1) No other load on the system
2) while running a = single up and single down netperf stream to icei.org (on the east coast)
3) then while sti= ll loaded, after turning on simple_qos.sh, set for ~85% of the rated up/dow= n bandwidth...
4) then killing the load, and keeping simple_qos enabled.
Is that good if I run the chrome benchmark from a win7 laptop on= 802.11n wifi, while netperfs are going from the wndr3800?

Regards,
Maciej
--f46d044786b5f468ff04d6928920--